Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Research & Search

Elicit vs Gemini Deep Research vs Consensus

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Elicit

3.8

From $49/user/mo

Gemini Deep Research

4.0

From $4.99/mo

Best overall

Consensus

4.1

From $20/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Elicit

3.8

Pick it if: Researchers, students and analysts who need to review a lot of papers carefully.

Gemini Deep Research

4.0
Best value

Pick it if: Anyone who needs a thorough written briefing on a topic and would rather edit than research.

Consensus

4.1
Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.

Consensus scores highest overall, but Gemini Deep Research gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeElicitGemini Deep ResearchConsensus
In one lineFinds, screens and summarises research papers into a comparison table.Google's agent that browses for minutes and writes a long, sourced report.Searches academic papers and tells you what the evidence actually says.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$49/user/mo$4.99/mo$20/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeElicitGemini Deep ResearchConsensus
Overall rating3.84.04.1Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
4.0
4.5
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
3.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeElicitGemini Deep ResearchConsensus
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes–
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No Yes–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes–
Understands images– Yes No
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No Yes No
Writes code No Yes No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes No
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages– Yes–
Capabilities score7/ 1714/ 175/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeElicitGemini Deep ResearchConsensus
Plans

Basic

Free

Searching and reading a few papers.

Free

Free

The occasional big question.

Free

Free

Occasional fact-checking.

ProOur pick

$49/user/mo billed yearly

Anyone doing a real literature review.

Google AI Plus

$4.99/mo

Light users who want a bit more headroom.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $12/mo billed yearly

Anyone who checks evidence weekly.

Scale

$169/user/mo billed yearly

Teams running many reviews at once.

Google AI ProOur pick

$19.99/mo

Anyone who runs a few reports a week or also uses NotebookLM.

Deep

$65/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly

Researchers and clinicians doing frequent literature reviews.

Enterprise

Custom

Universities, pharma and large research groups.

Google AI Ultra

From $99.99/mo

Power users who want the highest limits across all of Google AI.

Teams

Custom

Labs, departments and research groups.

Which plan to pickStay on Basic unless you have a review to run. When you do, Pro has everything one person needs, and the yearly commitment is the only way to get the quoted price. Scale is for teams, not for a solo researcher who wants more headroom.Try the free plan first; it is enough to see the style of report you get. If you want it weekly, Google AI Pro is the pick because the Pro model writes better reports and the same subscription upgrades NotebookLM and Gemini in Gmail and Docs.Start on Free. If you find yourself rationing the 10 Pro messages, Pro billed yearly is good value at $12 a month. Deep is only for people whose job is literature reviews; most readers here will never need it.

Key features

AttributeElicitGemini Deep ResearchConsensus
Standout features
  • Research Reports
  • Extraction tables
  • Systematic Review workflow
  • Chat with papers
  • Routines
  • Library and sharing
  • Editable research plan
  • Multi-page reports
  • Your own files
  • Audio Overview
  • Canvas
  • Everywhere Gemini is
  • Consensus Meter
  • Pro messages
  • Deep reviews
  • Study Snapshots
  • Quality filters
  • API and MCP

Pros and cons

AttributeElicitGemini Deep ResearchConsensus
Pros
  • Extraction tables save days on a literature review
  • Every answer links back to the passage in the paper
  • Systematic review workflow records why papers were included or excluded
  • Routines keep a review current without you remembering to check
  • Free plan is useful for reading and summarising
  • You can edit the plan before it runs, so fewer wasted reports
  • Reads more pages than Perplexity and lists every source
  • Can include your Gmail and Drive in the research
  • Free plan includes it, and Pro is good value for Workspace users
  • Audio Overviews and Canvas make the output easy to share
  • Consensus Meter gives an honest read on mixed evidence in seconds
  • Every summary links to the actual paper
  • Free plan is enough for occasional checks
  • Pro is cheap when billed yearly
  • Quality filters help you ignore weak studies
Cons
  • $49 a user a month is a lot for anyone outside research
  • Only academic papers; no business, news or grey literature
  • Extractions still need spot-checking against the source
  • Reports and large screens take a while to run
  • Collaboration is locked to the $169 Scale plan
  • Reports are long and often repetitive; plan to edit
  • Can take ten minutes or more per run
  • Free limits are not published as a number, so you find them by hitting them
  • Quieter on citation quality than Perplexity; weak sources slip in
  • Only covers academic research; no business or news sources
  • Can make thin or old evidence look more settled than it is
  • Monthly billing on Pro is nearly double the yearly rate
  • Deep review limits are low until you pay for the Deep plan

Who each one is for

AttributeElicitGemini Deep ResearchConsensus
Best for
  • Literature reviews
  • Extracting data from papers
  • Screening papers by criteria
  • Comparing studies in a table
  • Industry and market reports
  • Supplier or vendor comparisons
  • Briefings for a meeting
  • Long-form background research
  • Fact-checking health claims
  • Finding studies on a topic
  • Evidence for a blog or pitch
  • Student literature reviews
You'll find it used by
  • Researchers
  • Analysts
  • Clinicians
  • Postgraduate students
  • Consultants
  • Marketers
  • Founders
  • Google Workspace users
  • Health and wellness brands
  • Content marketers
  • Students
  • Clinicians

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More research & search tools from the library.