Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Cursor vs Google Antigravity vs Zed

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Cursor

3.9

From $8/mo

Google Antigravity

3.9

From $19.99/mo

Best overall

Zed

4.3

From $10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

Pick it if: Google AI Pro subscribers, and anyone who wants to try handing coding work to AI agents for free.

Zed4.3
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Developers who want a fast editor and already pay for Claude or another AI provider.

Overview

AttributeCursorGoogle AntigravityZed
In one lineA code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen.Google's free coding app. You hand tasks to AI agents and review what they produce.A fast, free, open-source code editor that runs Claude Code and other AI agents inside it.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumOpen source
Starting price$8/mo$19.99/mo$10/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCursorGoogle AntigravityZed
Overall rating3.93.94.3Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
3.5
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers the job it's built for, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
5.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5
5.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCursorGoogle AntigravityZed
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes No No
Desktop app Yes Yes Yes
Browser extension No Yes No
API access– Yes–
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score12/ 1714/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCursorGoogle AntigravityZed
Plans

Free

Free

Trying the editor and a few agent runs.

IndividualOur pick

Free

Trying agent-based coding without paying.

PersonalOur pick

Free

Almost everyone.

Plus

$8/mo

Light users who are happy with Grok models only.

Google AI Pro

$19.99/mo

People who already have or want the Google AI Pro bundle.

Pro

$10/mo

People who want Zed's hosted AI without managing keys.

PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Most developers who want Claude or OpenAI models.

Google AI Ultra

From $99.99/mo

Developers who want Antigravity as a daily driver.

Business

$30/seat/mo

Teams that need spending and access controls.

Super

$100/mo

Heavy daily agent users.

Business (via Google Cloud)

From $30/seat/mo

Companies already on Google Cloud.

Teams

From $30/user/mo

Companies that need admin controls and SSO.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Which plan to pickSkip Plus unless you are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude or OpenAI models, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. There is also a $200 Ultra plan with 50x the Plus usage for people who live in it.Start on the free Individual tier; it is the whole point. If you hit the weekly limits and you also use Gemini for other things, Google AI Pro at $19.99 is a sensible step. Ultra only makes sense for full-time developers.Personal. If you have Claude Pro, run Claude Code inside Zed and you are done. Pro only makes sense if you want Zed's built-in assistant and edit predictions without setting up API keys.

Key features

AttributeCursorGoogle AntigravityZed
Standout features
  • Tab autocomplete
  • Agent mode
  • Chat with your codebase
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Rules
  • Built on VS Code
  • Agent manager
  • Artifacts you can check
  • Full editor and CLI
  • Browser agent
  • Gemini models
  • Agent kit
  • Built for speed
  • External agents inside the editor
  • Bring your own keys
  • Edit predictions
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Open source

Pros and cons

AttributeCursorGoogle AntigravityZed
Pros
  • The clearest view of what an AI is doing to your code
  • Autocomplete is still the best in the category
  • Feels familiar instantly if you have used VS Code
  • Cloud agents and code review on the mid plans
  • Free tier is good enough for real projects
  • Agent manager and verification artifacts make reviewing AI work easier
  • Browser agent tests your app, not just the code
  • Included with Google AI Pro, which many people already pay for
  • Noticeably faster than VS Code and Cursor
  • Free, open source, and no charge for running your own agents
  • Clean agent panel that shows exactly what changed
  • Built-in real-time collaboration
Cons
  • Cheap plans only give you Grok models
  • Claude and OpenAI usage is billed on top of the subscription, so the real cost is hard to predict
  • The pricing page is confusing and has changed several times this year
  • Agent runs are less thorough than Claude Code on big tasks
  • Free limits have been cut before and could change again
  • Capacity errors at busy times on the free tier
  • Tied to Gemini models, so you cannot bring Claude or OpenAI
  • The product has been renamed and reorganised more than once this year
  • Smaller extension library than VS Code or Cursor
  • Less hand-holding for beginners; it assumes you know your way around an editor
  • Business plan has no SSO yet, which rules it out for some companies
  • Its own hosted AI is basic compared with the agents you can bring

Who each one is for

AttributeCursorGoogle AntigravityZed
Best for
  • Editing with AI autocomplete
  • Learning by watching changes happen
  • Multi-file changes in agent mode
  • Developers who like VS Code
  • Trying AI coding agents for free
  • Running several agents at once
  • Building with Gemini
  • Google AI Pro subscribers
  • Running Claude Code inside an editor
  • Speed on big projects
  • Using your own AI subscription
  • Pairing with teammates in real time
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Students
  • Technical founders
  • Google AI Pro subscribers
  • Developers
  • Students
  • Startups on Google Cloud
  • Developers
  • Claude Code users
  • Open source fans
  • Small teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Cursor, Google Antigravity or Zed?

Zed scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, Google Antigravity 3.9/5 and Zed 4.3/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. Google Antigravity is best for Trying AI coding agents for free and running several agents at once. Zed is best for Running Claude Code inside an editor and speed on big projects.

Which is cheaper, Cursor, Google Antigravity or Zed?

Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Google Antigravity: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $19.99/mo. Zed: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo.

Which is easier to use, Cursor, Google Antigravity or Zed?

Cursor rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.