Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Databases & Backend

Convex vs Firebase vs Render

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Convex

4.1

From $25/developer/mo

Firebase

4.1

From Pay as you go

Render

3.9

From $0/mo plus computing

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: People building collaborative or real-time apps with Claude Code who want the backend to just work.

Pick it if: Teams building mobile or real-time apps, especially if you already live in Google's world.

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Builders and small teams who want predictable monthly prices for hosting an app and its database.

Overview

AttributeConvexFirebaseRender
In one lineA backend that keeps every screen of your app in sync the moment the data changes.Google's backend for mobile and web apps, with logins, data and hosting in one.Simple hosting for websites, apps and databases, with free static sites.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$25/developer/moPay as you go$0/mo plus computing
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeConvexFirebaseRender
Overall rating4.14.13.9
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
3.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.5
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeConvexFirebaseRender
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No No No
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images No Yes–
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No–
Works in many languages–––
Capabilities score8/ 1710/ 177/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeConvexFirebaseRender
Plans

Free and Starter

Free, then pay as you go

Side projects and small teams getting started.

SparkOur pick

Free

Early projects and apps with a small audience.

HobbyOur pick

$0/mo plus computing

Personal projects and testing.

ProfessionalOur pick

$25/developer/mo

Products with real users.

Blaze

Pay as you go, no monthly fee

Anything that might grow past the free quotas.

Pro

$25/mo plus computing

Teams running production apps.

Business and Enterprise

From $2,500/mo

Larger companies with compliance and scale needs.

Scale

$499/mo plus computing

Teams with governance and compliance needs.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need uptime guarantees.

Which plan to pickStart on Free. Move to Professional when you launch, mainly for daily backups and the bigger limits. Business is a big jump aimed at teams of 50 or more, so most readers will never need it.Spark is enough until real users arrive. Move to Blaze when you need Cloud Functions or you're close to a quota, and set a budget alert the moment you do. There's no middle tier, so your bill goes straight from nothing to usage based.Stay on Hobby and pay only for the services you run. A $7 web service and a $6 database cover most small apps. Move to Pro when a team needs to share the workspace or you want autoscaling and previews.

Key features

AttributeConvexFirebaseRender
Standout features
  • Reactive database
  • Everything in TypeScript
  • Scheduled functions and workflows
  • File storage, search and vector search
  • Official MCP server and AI docs
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Firestore
  • Authentication
  • Hosting
  • Cloud Functions
  • Messaging and analytics
  • Firebase MCP server
  • Every kind of service
  • Managed Postgres and Key Value
  • Automatic deploys and previews
  • Autoscaling
  • Workflows and Sandboxes
  • MCP server

Pros and cons

AttributeConvexFirebaseRender
Pros
  • Live updates built in rather than bolted on
  • One language for the whole app, so AI coding tools make fewer mistakes
  • Scheduled tasks and crash-safe workflows included
  • Open source with a self-hosting option
  • Fair pricing for small teams
  • Proven at huge scale for over a decade
  • The best mobile tooling in this category
  • Live sync and offline support built in
  • Generous free plan with no card required
  • Push notifications, analytics and hosting in one place
  • Predictable fixed prices per service
  • Free static sites with no catch
  • Covers websites, APIs, workers, cron jobs and databases
  • Unlimited seats on Pro
  • MCP server for Claude Code
Cons
  • Not SQL, and no easy exit to another database
  • Built for developers; there's no friendly data editor for non-technical staff
  • Per-developer pricing penalises bigger teams
  • Smaller community than Supabase or Firebase
  • Document storage makes reporting and complex queries awkward
  • Usage-based costs can spike with traffic
  • Hard to move off, since nothing else uses Firestore's format
  • Google has retired products before, most recently Firebase Studio
  • Free web services sleep and take about a minute to wake
  • Free databases are deleted after 30 days
  • Team plans jump from $25 to $499
  • Bandwidth beyond the included amount costs extra

Who each one is for

AttributeConvexFirebaseRender
Best for
  • Collaborative and multiplayer apps
  • Live dashboards
  • Apps built mostly by Claude Code
  • Chat and AI agent backends
  • Mobile app backends
  • Live-updating data and chat
  • Sign in with Google or Apple
  • Push notifications
  • Hosting a backend or API with fixed monthly pricing
  • Free static websites
  • Background workers and scheduled jobs
  • Replacing Heroku
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startups
  • Claude Code users
  • Indie hackers
  • Mobile developers
  • Startups
  • Google shops
  • Hobbyists
  • Developers
  • Startups
  • Agencies
  • Indie builders

Questions people ask

Which is better, Convex, Firebase or Render?

They tie on our overall rating (Convex 4.1/5, Firebase 4.1/5 and Render 3.9/5). Convex is best for collaborative and multiplayer apps and live dashboards. Firebase is best for mobile app backends and live-updating data and chat. Render is best for hosting a backend or API with fixed monthly pricing and free static websites.

Which is cheaper, Convex, Firebase or Render?

Convex: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $25/developer/mo. Firebase: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at Pay as you go. Render: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0/mo plus computing.

Which is easier to use, Convex, Firebase or Render?

Render rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Builders and small teams who want predictable monthly prices for hosting an app and its database.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Databases & Backend in the library.