Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Databases & Backend

Convex vs Firebase vs Appwrite

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Convex

4.1

From $25/developer/mo

Firebase

4.1

From Pay as you go

Appwrite

3.7

From From $25/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Convex

4.1

Pick it if: People building collaborative or real-time apps with Claude Code who want the backend to just work.

Firebase

4.1

Pick it if: Teams building mobile or real-time apps, especially if you already live in Google's world.

Appwrite

3.7

Pick it if: Builders who want Firebase-style convenience without being tied to one company's cloud.

Overview

AttributeConvexFirebaseAppwrite
In one lineA backend that keeps every screen of your app in sync the moment the data changes.Google's backend for mobile and web apps, with logins, data and hosting in one.An open-source, all-in-one backend with a database, logins, storage and hosting.
Pricing modelOpen sourceFreemiumOpen source
Starting price$25/developer/moPay as you goFrom $25/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeConvexFirebaseAppwrite
Overall rating4.14.13.7
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
3.5
3.5
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.5
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeConvexFirebaseAppwrite
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No No No
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images No Yes No
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages–––
Capabilities score8/ 1710/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeConvexFirebaseAppwrite
Plans

Free and Starter

Free, then pay as you go

Side projects and small teams getting started.

SparkOur pick

Free

Early projects and apps with a small audience.

Free

Free

Learning and small personal projects.

ProfessionalOur pick

$25/developer/mo

Products with real users.

Blaze

Pay as you go, no monthly fee

Anything that might grow past the free quotas.

ProOur pick

From $25/mo

Live apps and small teams.

Business and Enterprise

From $2,500/mo

Larger companies with compliance and scale needs.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies with compliance needs.

Self-hosted

Free (your own server costs)

Anyone who wants full control of their data.

Which plan to pickStart on Free. Move to Professional when you launch, mainly for daily backups and the bigger limits. Business is a big jump aimed at teams of 50 or more, so most readers will never need it.Spark is enough until real users arrive. Move to Blaze when you need Cloud Functions or you're close to a quota, and set a budget alert the moment you do. There's no middle tier, so your bill goes straight from nothing to usage based.Free is enough to build and show a prototype. Pro at $25 is good value because the price covers your whole team rather than each seat. Self-host only if you already run servers; the time it takes to keep one patched quickly costs more than $25 a month.

Key features

AttributeConvexFirebaseAppwrite
Standout features
  • Reactive database
  • Everything in TypeScript
  • Scheduled functions and workflows
  • File storage, search and vector search
  • Official MCP server and AI docs
  • Open source and self-hostable
  • Firestore
  • Authentication
  • Hosting
  • Cloud Functions
  • Messaging and analytics
  • Firebase MCP server
  • Databases
  • Auth
  • Storage and functions
  • Messaging
  • Sites
  • Self-host or Cloud

Pros and cons

AttributeConvexFirebaseAppwrite
Pros
  • Live updates built in rather than bolted on
  • One language end to end, so AI coding tools make fewer mistakes
  • Scheduled functions and durable workflows included
  • Open source with a self-hosting option
  • Fair pricing for small teams
  • Battle-tested at huge scale for over a decade
  • The best mobile tooling in this category
  • Live sync and offline support built in
  • Generous free plan with no card required
  • Push notifications, analytics and hosting in one place
  • Everything in one place, including messaging and hosting
  • Open source and self-hostable for free
  • Pro pricing covers the whole team, not per seat
  • Strong mobile and Flutter support
  • Permissions down to the individual record
Cons
  • Not SQL, and no easy exit to another database
  • Built for developers; there's no friendly data editor for non-technical staff
  • Per-developer pricing penalises bigger teams
  • Smaller community than Supabase or Firebase
  • Document storage makes reporting and complex queries awkward
  • Usage-based costs can spike with traffic
  • Hard to move off, since nothing else speaks Firestore
  • Google has retired products before, most recently Firebase Studio
  • Much smaller community and fewer tutorials than Supabase or Firebase
  • Few AI app builders support it out of the box
  • Document database makes SQL-style reporting harder
  • SSO is still marked as coming soon

Who each one is for

AttributeConvexFirebaseAppwrite
Best for
  • Collaborative and multiplayer apps
  • Live dashboards
  • Apps built mostly by Claude Code
  • Chat and AI agent backends
  • Mobile app backends
  • Live-updating data and chat
  • Sign in with Google or Apple
  • Push notifications
  • Open-source Firebase alternative
  • Self-hosted backends
  • Logins, storage and functions in one place
  • Hosting the front end and backend together
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startups
  • Claude Code users
  • Indie hackers
  • Mobile developers
  • Startups
  • Google shops
  • Hobbyists
  • Developers
  • Flutter developers
  • Open-source fans
  • Privacy-minded teams

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More databases & backend tools from the library.