Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows

Composio vs Gumloop vs Parseur

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Composio

4.2

From $29/mo

Gumloop

3.9

From From $37/mo

Parseur

4.1

From $49/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best overallBest value

Pick it if: People who already use Claude or ChatGPT every day and want it to act in their business apps, plus developers building agents that need app access.

Pick it if: Marketers, sales teams and researchers who want AI to do the repetitive reading, sorting and summarising.

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.

Overview

AttributeComposioGumloopParseur
In one linePlug Claude or ChatGPT into 1,500+ apps so it can send the email, not just draft it.Build AI agents that research, scrape and enrich data across your work apps.Pulls data out of emails and PDFs into your spreadsheets and apps.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$29/moFrom $37/mo$49/mo
Free plan Yes No Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeComposioGumloopParseur
Overall rating4.2Winner3.94.1
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
3.5
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeComposioGumloopParseur
Access & platform
Free plan Yes No Yes
Mobile app No No–
Desktop app No No–
Browser extension No Yes–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No–
AI abilities
Works with your files No Yes Yes
Understands images– Yes–
Makes images No– No
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes No
Learns your brand or style No Yes–
Works in many languages No– Yes
Capabilities score6/ 1710/ 177/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeComposioGumloopParseur
Plans

HobbyOur pick

Free

Individuals connecting their own assistant to their own apps.

ProOur pick

From $37/mo

Anyone who wants AI doing the research and data work.

Free

Free

Trying it on a handful of documents.

Pro

$29/mo

Teams, or products with real users calling tools.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need security controls and a private cloud.

Micro

$49/mo, or $468/yr

A small business with a trickle of documents.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies with security reviews and high volume.

StarterOur pick

$129/mo, or $1,188/yr

Teams processing a few dozen documents a day.

Pro

$499/mo, or $4,788/yr

Operations teams with high volume.

Enterprise

Custom

Very high volume or custom contract terms.

Which plan to pickIf you are connecting your own Claude or ChatGPT to your own apps, Hobby is all you need. Move to Pro when a team or a product of yours starts using it, so usage keeps running past the free cap instead of pausing until next month.Pro is the only option short of Enterprise, so use the 14-day trial to run one real job end to end and watch the credit meter. If it comes in under 20,000 credits a month, you are set.Use Free to prove it can read your documents, then pick the plan that matches your monthly page count. Starter is where the cost per page becomes reasonable; yearly billing knocks roughly a quarter off.

Key features

AttributeComposioGumloopParseur
Standout features
  • 1,500+ app toolkits
  • Works inside your assistant
  • Managed sign-ins
  • Triggers
  • Custom tools and MCP servers
  • Developer platform
  • Agents from a description
  • Web scraping and browsing
  • 35+ AI models
  • Company Brain
  • Chrome extension
  • MCP and CLI
  • AI parsing
  • Template mode
  • Mailbox per job
  • Exports everywhere
  • Post-processing

Pros and cons

AttributeComposioGumloopParseur
Pros
  • One connection covers more than 1,500 apps
  • Very generous free plan
  • Works with Claude, ChatGPT, Claude Code and Cursor
  • Handles app logins and token refresh for you
  • Usage pricing is cheap compared with per-task tools
  • Builds a working agent from a plain-English description
  • Strong at scraping, research and enrichment jobs
  • Unlimited seats, so the whole team can use one plan
  • Choice of models and the option to bring your own keys
  • Quick to set up: forward an email and name the fields
  • Handles varying layouts without building templates
  • API, webhooks and automation connections on every plan
  • Support is consistently praised in reviews
  • Yearly billing brings the price down noticeably
Cons
  • Built for developers first, so the dashboard has jargon
  • Not a workflow builder: no canvas or scheduled runs
  • Some actions in less popular apps are thin
  • Extras like web search and transcription are billed per call
  • No free plan, only a 14-day trial
  • The 8% orchestration fee sits on top of model costs
  • Costs more than Zapier or Make for simple non-AI automations
  • Fewer everyday app connections than the big automation tools
  • Pricing and plan structure have changed several times
  • Free plan is only 20 pages a month, short for a proper test
  • Expensive per page at low volumes
  • Advanced features are thinly documented
  • Not built for approval workflows or direct ERP posting

Who each one is for

AttributeComposioGumloopParseur
Best for
  • Letting Claude act in Gmail, Slack and your CRM
  • One connector instead of dozens of MCP servers
  • Giving custom AI agents access to users' apps
  • Covering apps with no official connector
  • Website scraping and research
  • Lead enrichment and scoring
  • Summarising documents in bulk
  • Scheduled reports from your work apps
  • Order and booking emails into a spreadsheet
  • Lead notification emails into a CRM
  • Supplier invoices and delivery notes
  • Recurring PDF reports
  • Feeding Zapier and Make workflows
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Ops teams
  • Developers
  • AI power users
  • Marketers
  • Sales teams
  • Researchers
  • Ops teams
  • Small business owners
  • Operations teams
  • E-commerce stores
  • Property and travel businesses
  • Bookkeepers

Questions people ask

Which is better, Composio, Gumloop or Parseur?

Composio scores highest overall in our ratings (Composio 4.2/5, Gumloop 3.9/5 and Parseur 4.1/5). Composio is best for Letting Claude act in Gmail, Slack and your CRM and one connector instead of dozens of MCP servers. Gumloop is best for website scraping and research and lead enrichment and scoring. Parseur is best for order and booking emails into a spreadsheet and lead notification emails into a CRM.

Which is cheaper, Composio, Gumloop or Parseur?

Composio: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $29/mo. Gumloop: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at From $37/mo. Parseur: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/mo.

Which is easier to use, Composio, Gumloop or Parseur?

Parseur rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Small businesses and operations teams that copy details from the same kinds of email or PDF into spreadsheets or other apps.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.