Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

CodeRabbit vs Devin vs Warp

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

CodeRabbit

3.9

From $24/dev/mo

Devin

3.6

From $20/mo

Best overall

Warp

4.1

From $20/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Teams and solo builders shipping code through GitHub or GitLab, especially those letting AI agents write most of it.

Pick it if: Software teams and technical founders with a backlog of small, clearly defined coding jobs they would rather delegate.

Warp4.1
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Anyone who has to use the terminal but never wanted to learn it.

Overview

AttributeCodeRabbitDevinWarp
In one lineAI that reviews every code change on GitHub and flags bugs before they go live.An AI software engineer: hand it a task in Slack or Linear and get back a pull request.A modern terminal where you can type what you want in plain English instead of commands.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$24/dev/mo$20/mo$20/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCodeRabbitDevinWarp
Overall rating3.93.64.1Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
3.5
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
3.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCodeRabbitDevinWarp
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No– No
Desktop app No Yes Yes
Browser extension No– No
API access Yes Yes–
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted– No No
AI abilities
Works with your files No Yes Yes
Understands images No Yes–
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score9/ 1712/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCodeRabbitDevinWarp
Plans

Free

Free

Open-source projects and trying it out.

Free

Free

Trying Devin Desktop as an editor.

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone who just wants a better terminal.

EssentialsOur pick

$24/dev/mo billed yearly, or $30 monthly

Small teams who want every pull request reviewed.

ProOur pick

$20/mo

Individuals who want the editor and the cloud agent.

Build

$20/mo, or $18/mo billed yearly

People who lean on the Warp agent daily.

Team

$48/dev/mo billed yearly, or $60 monthly

Busier teams with many open pull requests.

Max

$200/mo

Heavy users running agents most of the day.

Max

$200/mo, or $180/mo billed yearly

Heavy agent users.

Advanced

$72/dev/mo billed yearly, or $90 monthly

Teams that want security monitoring.

Teams

$80/mo plus $40 per developer seat

Teams of up to 200 who want shared sessions and admin.

Business

$50/user/mo, or $45/user/mo billed yearly

Teams that need SSO and usage metrics.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Enterprise

Custom

Large companies with security requirements.

Enterprise

Custom

Large organisations.

Which plan to pickStart with the 14-day trial. Essentials is enough for most small teams; you only pay for developers who open pull requests. Turn on usage-based reviews ($0.25 a file) with a monthly cap if you keep hitting the hourly limit.Pro at $20 is the place to start, and it is the only sensible way to try the cloud agent. Watch your quota for the first fortnight, and use cheaper models for routine jobs before deciding whether Max or Teams is worth it.Stay on Free. The terminal is the product, and you can run Claude Code inside it on your Claude subscription without paying Warp anything. Only buy Build if you find yourself using Warp's own agent more than Claude Code.

Key features

AttributeCodeRabbitDevinWarp
Standout features
  • Pull request reviews
  • One-click fixes
  • Learns your rules
  • Reviews before you commit
  • Pre-merge checks
  • Triage and security
  • Devin Cloud
  • Devin Desktop
  • Work from Slack and Linear
  • Devin Review
  • Choice of models
  • DeepWiki and memory
  • Plain-English commands
  • A proper text editor for commands
  • Blocks and searchable history
  • Warp agent
  • Home for other agents
  • Shared workflows

Pros and cons

AttributeCodeRabbitDevinWarp
Pros
  • Set up in minutes and reviews every pull request automatically
  • Catches real bugs, including ones the coding agent missed
  • Works with any coding agent or editor
  • Free for open-source projects
  • Learns your preferences when you reply to it
  • Truly hands-off: it works in the background and returns a pull request
  • Editor, cloud agent, terminal and code review on one subscription
  • Picks up tasks from Slack, Teams, Linear and Jira
  • Wide model choice, including cheap open models and its own SWE-2
  • New frontier models usually arrive within days of launch
  • The best-looking and most forgiving terminal available
  • Plain-English commands remove the biggest barrier for beginners
  • Free for the terminal itself, with your own AI keys allowed
  • Fast, and runs on Mac, Windows and Linux
Cons
  • Marketed as unlimited, but hourly caps and fair-use throttling frustrate heavy users
  • Can be noisy, with nitpicks mixed in with real problems
  • Per-developer pricing adds up for bigger teams
  • Some users report billing mistakes, refund trouble and slow support
  • Success drops sharply on vague or complex tasks, so a developer still has to review everything
  • The daily and weekly quota is opaque, and good models can use a day's allowance in minutes
  • The free SWE-2 model, a big reason people subscribe, goes back to paid use after 1 November 2026
  • Users report slow support, including over unexpected on-demand charges
  • The Windsurf-to-Devin switch left gaps between the desktop and cloud versions, and some leftover clutter
  • Its own agent is a step behind Claude Code and Codex
  • Metered agent usage on paid plans runs out faster than you expect
  • You need an account to use it, which some developers dislike
  • Not an editor, so you still need another tool to browse files

Who each one is for

AttributeCodeRabbitDevinWarp
Best for
  • Reviewing AI-written code before it ships
  • Small teams without a senior reviewer
  • Catching bugs and security issues in pull requests
  • Open-source projects (free)
  • Clearing a backlog of small bugs and tickets
  • Handing off coding tasks from Slack or Linear
  • Code migrations and writing tests
  • Teams that want an editor and cloud agent on one plan
  • A nicer home for Claude Code
  • Plain-English commands
  • Searchable command history
  • Sharing commands with your team
You'll find it used by
  • Software teams
  • Open-source maintainers
  • Agencies
  • Solo founders
  • Engineering teams
  • Enterprises
  • Technical founders
  • Former Windsurf users
  • Developers
  • Ops teams
  • Terminal beginners
  • Founders

Questions people ask

Which is better, CodeRabbit, Devin or Warp?

Warp scores highest overall in our ratings (CodeRabbit 3.9/5, Devin 3.6/5 and Warp 4.1/5). CodeRabbit is best for Reviewing AI-written code before it ships and small teams without a senior reviewer. Devin is best for clearing a backlog of small bugs and tickets and handing off coding tasks from Slack or Linear. Warp is best for A nicer home for Claude Code and Plain-English commands.

Which is cheaper, CodeRabbit, Devin or Warp?

CodeRabbit: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $24/dev/mo. Devin: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Warp: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.