Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs
ChatPDF vs GPT for Work vs Pitch
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone who needs quick answers from a PDF, like a manual, report or contract, without reading the whole thing.
Pick it if: Marketers, ecommerce teams and operations staff who do the same text job across hundreds of spreadsheet rows.
Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.
Overview
| Attribute | ChatPDF | GPT for Work | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Upload a PDF and ask it questions, with answers that point to the page they came from. | AI functions and bulk AI jobs inside Google Sheets and Excel, plus Docs and Word. | Collaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting price | $0 | $25/mo | €10/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | ChatPDF | GPT for Work | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.9 | 4.2Winner | 4.0 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | ChatPDF | GPT for Work | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Mobile app | No | – | Yes |
| Desktop app | Yes | – | Yes |
| Browser extension | No | – | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | No |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | No | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | – | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | No | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | Yes |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | – | No |
| Runs agents or automations | No | Yes | No |
| Learns your brand or style | – | – | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 5/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | ChatPDF | GPT for Work | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free $0 The occasional document. | StandardOur pick $25/mo One person running bulk jobs. | Free Free Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out. |
PlusOur pick About $19.99/mo, cheaper billed yearly People who read lots of documents. | Business $45/seat/mo Teams sharing a budget. | PlusOur pick €10/mo billed yearly One person who sends decks to clients. | |
Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | Team €15/seat/mo billed yearly Small teams building decks together. | ||
Business €20/seat/mo billed yearly Larger teams sending lots of decks. | |||
Enterprise Custom Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Free is fine for a document or two a day. Before paying for Plus, try NotebookLM, which is free, or use Claude or ChatGPT if you already pay for one. | Standard covers most individuals; watch the usage dashboard on your first big job. Move to Business when several people need it or you want to run it on your own AI account. | Start on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking. |
Key features
| Attribute | ChatPDF | GPT for Work | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | ChatPDF | GPT for Work | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | ChatPDF | GPT for Work | Pitch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, ChatPDF, GPT for Work or Pitch?
GPT for Work scores highest overall in our ratings (ChatPDF 3.9/5, GPT for Work 4.2/5 and Pitch 4.0/5). ChatPDF is best for quick questions about a single PDF and summarising reports and manuals. GPT for Work is best for Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows and categorising and tagging data. Pitch is best for fundraising and sales decks and collaborative editing.
Which is cheaper, ChatPDF, GPT for Work or Pitch?
ChatPDF: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0. GPT for Work: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $25/mo. Pitch: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €10/mo.
Which is easier to use, ChatPDF, GPT for Work or Pitch?
ChatPDF rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who needs quick answers from a PDF, like a manual, report or contract, without reading the whole thing.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.
