Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Beautiful.ai vs Claude Design vs Gamma

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Beautiful.ai

3.7

From $14.50/mo

Claude Design

4.1

From $20/mo

Best overall

Gamma

4.5

Free to start

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Beautiful.ai

3.7

Pick it if: Sales and consulting teams who make lots of decks and want them to look consistent without a designer.

Claude Design

4.1
Best value

Pick it if: Founders, marketers and product people who need presentable decks and mockups without a designer on call.

Gamma

4.5
Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who dreads building slides and would rather start from a finished draft than a blank template.

Gamma scores highest overall, but Claude Design gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignGamma
In one lineSlides that lay themselves out neatly as you add content, so decks never look messy.Describe a deck, one-pager or prototype and get a polished, on-brand version.Paste an outline and get a finished, well-designed deck, document or web page in minutes.
Pricing modelPaidPaidFreemium
Starting price$14.50/mo$20/moFree
Free plan No Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignGamma
Overall rating3.74.14.5Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
5.0
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.0
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignGamma
Access & platform
Free plan No Yes Yes
Mobile app No No Yes
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No No No
API access No No Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images– Yes–
Makes images Yes Yes Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes No
Runs agents or automations No No Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages– Yes Yes
Capabilities score6/ 1710/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignGamma
Plans

ProOur pick

$14.50/mo billed yearly, or $45 month to month

One person who makes decks regularly.

Free

Free

Trying a deck or two.

Free

Free

Testing whether the output suits you.

Team

$40/user/mo billed yearly, or $50 billed monthly

Teams of 2 to 20 who need consistent decks.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone making decks or mockups most weeks.

PlusOur pick

See website

Individuals who make a few decks a month.

Enterprise

Custom

Larger companies with security requirements.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users who also live in Claude Code.

Pro

See website

People who present weekly or want analytics and the API.

Team

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses that want shared brand context and central billing.

Ultra

See website

Heavy users running Gamma all day.

Enterprise

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly, plus usage

Larger organisations needing SSO and audit controls.

Business

See website

Companies that need admin controls and single sign-on.

Which plan to pickPro on the yearly plan is the only sensible individual option, because month to month costs three times as much. Go to Team only if several people build decks and you want the brand locked, since $40 a seat adds up fast.If you already pay for Claude Pro, you have it. If not, try Design on the Free plan and move to Pro when the daily limits get in the way, which happens quickly once you're iterating on a deck. Team makes sense when several people need the same brand setup.Use the free credits to make two or three decks and judge the output. If you'll keep using it, Plus is the sensible step because it removes the badge and refreshes credits monthly. Only move to Pro if you want the API, custom domains or viewer analytics.

Key features

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignGamma
Standout features
  • Smart Slides
  • DesignerBot
  • Locked brand themes
  • Shared slide library
  • PowerPoint in and out
  • Engagement analytics
  • Brief it like a designer
  • Brand matching
  • Decks, pages and prototypes
  • Export where you need it
  • Hand off to Claude Code
  • Shared with your Claude plan
  • Generate from anything
  • Cards, not slides
  • Gamma Agent
  • Themes and brand kit
  • Export anywhere
  • API and connectors

Pros and cons

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignGamma
Pros
  • Slides never look messy, no matter who edits them
  • Brand lock keeps a whole company's decks consistent
  • Shared slide library saves rebuilding the same slides
  • Analytics show how prospects read your deck
  • Matches your brand far better than other generators
  • No extra subscription if you already use Claude
  • Handles decks, pages and prototypes in one place
  • Clean hand-off to Claude Code for building
  • You refine by talking, which non-designers find natural
  • Fastest route from notes to a presentable deck
  • Designs look polished without any design skill
  • One file works as a deck, document or web page
  • The agent makes rewrites and restyles painless
  • API and connectors mean it fits into automated workflows
Cons
  • No free plan, and the trial charges your card if you forget to cancel
  • Monthly billing is expensive at $45 for one person
  • Templates are restrictive if you want a custom layout
  • AI drafts are plainer than Gamma's and need more work
  • Still new, so layouts occasionally need manual fixing
  • Slower to generate than Gamma
  • Uses up your Claude usage limits, which bite on Free and Pro
  • No standalone API for automated deck generation
  • Free credits are a one-off, so the free plan runs out
  • Hard to keep strictly on brand across many decks
  • Credits drain quickly if you regenerate images often
  • Exports to PowerPoint don't always keep the layout intact

Who each one is for

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignGamma
Best for
  • Consistent sales decks
  • Team-wide brand templates
  • Charts and data slides
  • Quick-polish presentations
  • Pitch and client decks
  • Landing page and app prototypes
  • One-pagers and proposals
  • On-brand marketing visuals
  • Pitch decks from notes
  • Internal updates and proposals
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Simple one-page websites
You'll find it used by
  • Sales teams
  • Consultants
  • Agencies
  • Marketers
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Product teams
  • Agencies
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Sales teams
  • Educators

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More presentations & docs tools from the library.