Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Beautiful.ai vs Claude Design vs Pitch

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Beautiful.ai

3.7

From $14.50/mo

Best overall

Claude Design

4.1

From $20/mo

Pitch

4.0

From €10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Beautiful.ai

3.7

Pick it if: Sales and consulting teams who make lots of decks and want them to look consistent without a designer.

Claude Design

4.1
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Founders, marketers and product people who need presentable decks and mockups without a designer on call.

Pitch

4.0

Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.

Overview

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignPitch
In one lineSlides that lay themselves out neatly as you add content, so decks never look messy.Describe a deck, one-pager or prototype and get a polished, on-brand version.Collaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking.
Pricing modelPaidPaidFreemium
Starting price$14.50/mo$20/mo€10/mo
Free plan No Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignPitch
Overall rating3.74.1Winner4.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
4.0
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignPitch
Access & platform
Free plan No Yes Yes
Mobile app No No Yes
Desktop app No No Yes
Browser extension No No No
API access No No No
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images– Yes–
Makes images Yes Yes Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code No Yes No
Runs agents or automations No No No
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages– Yes Yes
Capabilities score6/ 1710/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignPitch
Plans

ProOur pick

$14.50/mo billed yearly, or $45 month to month

One person who makes decks regularly.

Free

Free

Trying a deck or two.

Free

Free

Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out.

Team

$40/user/mo billed yearly, or $50 billed monthly

Teams of 2 to 20 who need consistent decks.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone making decks or mockups most weeks.

PlusOur pick

€10/mo billed yearly

One person who sends decks to clients.

Enterprise

Custom

Larger companies with security requirements.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users who also live in Claude Code.

Team

€15/seat/mo billed yearly

Small teams building decks together.

Team

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses that want shared brand context and central billing.

Business

€20/seat/mo billed yearly

Larger teams sending lots of decks.

Enterprise

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly, plus usage

Larger organisations needing SSO and audit controls.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs.

Which plan to pickPro on the yearly plan is the only sensible individual option, because month to month costs three times as much. Go to Team only if several people build decks and you want the brand locked, since $40 a seat adds up fast.If you already pay for Claude Pro, you have it. If not, try Design on the Free plan and move to Pro when the daily limits get in the way, which happens quickly once you're iterating on a deck. Team makes sense when several people need the same brand setup.Start on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking.

Key features

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignPitch
Standout features
  • Smart Slides
  • DesignerBot
  • Locked brand themes
  • Shared slide library
  • PowerPoint in and out
  • Engagement analytics
  • Brief it like a designer
  • Brand matching
  • Decks, pages and prototypes
  • Export where you need it
  • Hand off to Claude Code
  • Shared with your Claude plan
  • Live collaboration
  • AI first drafts
  • Custom templates
  • Pitch rooms and advanced links
  • Exports
  • Desktop and mobile apps

Pros and cons

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignPitch
Pros
  • Slides never look messy, no matter who edits them
  • Brand lock keeps a whole company's decks consistent
  • Shared slide library saves rebuilding the same slides
  • Analytics show how prospects read your deck
  • Matches your brand far better than other generators
  • No extra subscription if you already use Claude
  • Handles decks, pages and prototypes in one place
  • Clean hand-off to Claude Code for building
  • You refine by talking, which non-designers find natural
  • Best collaboration features in the category
  • Templates and brand controls that non-designers can follow
  • Viewer analytics tell you what happens after you hit send
  • Free plan is enough for small teams to work in
  • Desktop apps and a clean, fast editor
Cons
  • No free plan, and the trial charges your card if you forget to cancel
  • Monthly billing is expensive at $45 for one person
  • Templates are restrictive if you want a custom layout
  • AI drafts are plainer than Gamma's and need more work
  • Still new, so layouts occasionally need manual fixing
  • Slower to generate than Gamma
  • Uses up your Claude usage limits, which bite on Free and Pro
  • No standalone API for automated deck generation
  • AI credits are modest and the free batch never renews
  • Free plan exports carry Pitch branding and skip PowerPoint
  • Pricing is in euros, so your bill moves with the exchange rate
  • Fewer AI design flourishes than Gamma, so drafts need more hands-on work

Who each one is for

AttributeBeautiful.aiClaude DesignPitch
Best for
  • Consistent sales decks
  • Team-wide brand templates
  • Charts and data slides
  • Quick-polish presentations
  • Pitch and client decks
  • Landing page and app prototypes
  • One-pagers and proposals
  • On-brand marketing visuals
  • Fundraising and sales decks
  • Collaborative editing
  • Tracking who viewed a deck
  • Branded team templates
You'll find it used by
  • Sales teams
  • Consultants
  • Agencies
  • Marketers
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Product teams
  • Agencies
  • Startups
  • Sales teams
  • Agencies
  • Marketers

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More presentations & docs tools from the library.