Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Databases & Backend

Appwrite vs Firebase vs Neon

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Appwrite

3.7

From From $25/mo

Best overall

Firebase

4.1

From Pay as you go

Neon

4.0

From Pay as you go

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Appwrite

3.7

Pick it if: Builders who want Firebase-style convenience without being tied to one company's cloud.

Firebase

4.1
Best overall

Pick it if: Teams building mobile or real-time apps, especially if you already live in Google's world.

Neon

4.0
Best value

Pick it if: Developers and Claude Code users who want a dependable Postgres database and nothing else.

Firebase scores highest overall, but Neon gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeAppwriteFirebaseNeon
In one lineAn open-source, all-in-one backend with a database, logins, storage and hosting.Google's backend for mobile and web apps, with logins, data and hosting in one.A Postgres database that scales to zero when idle, so side projects cost nothing.
Pricing modelOpen sourceFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFrom $25/moPay as you goPay as you go
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeAppwriteFirebaseNeon
Overall rating3.74.1Winner4.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
3.5
3.5
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
3.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
3.5
4.0
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.0
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
4.5
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeAppwriteFirebaseNeon
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No No No
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No No No
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes No
Understands images No Yes No
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes No
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages–––
Capabilities score9/ 1710/ 177/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeAppwriteFirebaseNeon
Plans

Free

Free

Learning and small personal projects.

SparkOur pick

Free

Early projects and apps with a small audience.

FreeOur pick

Free

Side projects and learning.

ProOur pick

From $25/mo

Live apps and small teams.

Blaze

Pay as you go, no monthly fee

Anything that might grow past the free quotas.

Launch

Pay as you go, no monthly minimum

Small production apps.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies with compliance needs.

Scale

Pay as you go, higher rates

Teams needing an SLA and bigger databases.

Self-hosted

Free (your own server costs)

Anyone who wants full control of their data.

Which plan to pickFree is enough to build and show a prototype. Pro at $25 is good value because the price covers your whole team rather than each seat. Self-host only if you already run servers; the time it takes to keep one patched quickly costs more than $25 a month.Spark is enough until real users arrive. Move to Blaze when you need Cloud Functions or you're close to a quota, and set a budget alert the moment you do. There's no middle tier, so your bill goes straight from nothing to usage based.Free covers more than you'd expect, including several small live apps. Move to Launch when a project needs more than 100 compute hours a month or a longer restore window. Scale is for teams that need an SLA, not for individuals.

Key features

AttributeAppwriteFirebaseNeon
Standout features
  • Databases
  • Auth
  • Storage and functions
  • Messaging
  • Sites
  • Self-host or Cloud
  • Firestore
  • Authentication
  • Hosting
  • Cloud Functions
  • Messaging and analytics
  • Firebase MCP server
  • Serverless Postgres
  • Branching
  • Point-in-time restore
  • Official MCP server
  • Neon Auth

Pros and cons

AttributeAppwriteFirebaseNeon
Pros
  • Everything in one place, including messaging and hosting
  • Open source and self-hostable for free
  • Pro pricing covers the whole team, not per seat
  • Strong mobile and Flutter support
  • Permissions down to the individual record
  • Battle-tested at huge scale for over a decade
  • The best mobile tooling in this category
  • Live sync and offline support built in
  • Generous free plan with no card required
  • Push notifications, analytics and hosting in one place
  • Real Postgres, no lock-in
  • Free plan allows 100 projects
  • Branching is genuinely useful, not a gimmick
  • No monthly minimum on paid plans
  • First-class Vercel integration
Cons
  • Much smaller community and fewer tutorials than Supabase or Firebase
  • Few AI app builders support it out of the box
  • Document database makes SQL-style reporting harder
  • SSO is still marked as coming soon
  • Document storage makes reporting and complex queries awkward
  • Usage-based costs can spike with traffic
  • Hard to move off, since nothing else speaks Firestore
  • Google has retired products before, most recently Firebase Studio
  • Only the database; no storage, functions or mature auth
  • Cold starts add a delay after a project has been idle
  • Usage billing takes some learning to predict
  • Now owned by Databricks, so the direction could shift

Who each one is for

AttributeAppwriteFirebaseNeon
Best for
  • Open-source Firebase alternative
  • Self-hosted backends
  • Logins, storage and functions in one place
  • Hosting the front end and backend together
  • Mobile app backends
  • Live-updating data and chat
  • Sign in with Google or Apple
  • Push notifications
  • Postgres for side projects
  • Safe database experiments with branching
  • Apps hosted on Vercel
  • Usage-based pricing
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Flutter developers
  • Open-source fans
  • Privacy-minded teams
  • Mobile developers
  • Startups
  • Google shops
  • Hobbyists
  • Developers
  • Vercel users
  • Startups
  • Claude Code users

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More databases & backend tools from the library.