Side-by-side comparison · Sales & Customer Support
Apollo.io vs Hyperbound vs Reply.io
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Founders, small sales teams and marketers who need to find B2B contacts and email them.
Pick it if: Sales managers and enablement teams onboarding and coaching reps on calls.
Pick it if: Small sales teams, founders and agencies running cold email and LinkedIn outreach.
Hyperbound scores highest overall, but Apollo.io gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Hyperbound | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | B2B contact database with emails and phone numbers, plus sequences to reach them. | AI sales role-play: practise cold calls and objections with realistic AI buyers. | Cold email and LinkedIn outreach sequences, plus an AI SDR that writes and replies. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Paid |
| Starting price | $49/seat/mo | Free | From $49/user/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | No | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Hyperbound | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 4.1Winner | 3.7 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 3.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Hyperbound | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | – | – |
| Desktop app | – | – | – |
| Browser extension | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | – | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | – |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | – | – | – |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | – | No | – |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | – | – |
| Works in many languages | – | – | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 8/ 17 | 6/ 17 | 6/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Hyperbound | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Founders testing outbound. | Free Free Trying AI role-play with a few reps. | Email Volume From $49/user/mo billed yearly, or $59 monthly Email-only cold outreach. |
Basic $49/seat/mo billed yearly Individual sellers doing regular outbound. | PracticeOur pick Custom per user Teams that want reps rehearsing on AI. | MultichannelOur pick $89/user/mo billed yearly, or $99 monthly Teams running email and LinkedIn together. | |
ProfessionalOur pick $79/seat/mo billed yearly Full-time reps. | Perform Custom per user Teams that also want real calls scored and coached. | Jason AI SDR From $500/mo billed yearly Teams wanting AI to run outbound end to end. | |
Organization $119/seat/mo billed yearly (min 3 seats) Sales teams wanting advanced controls. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Start on Free to check the data covers your market. Basic suits one person prospecting; Professional is worth it if you also call prospects or want AI scoring. Monthly billing costs noticeably more than the yearly prices shown. | Run the free role-plays with two or three reps first. If they keep using them, Practice covers rehearsal; only pay for Perform if you do not already have Gong or another call recorder. | Multichannel is the best value if you use LinkedIn at all, since the add-ons on Email Volume quickly cost more. Only look at Jason AI SDR once your manual sequences are already booking meetings. |
Key features
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Hyperbound | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Hyperbound | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Hyperbound | Reply.io |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apollo.io, Hyperbound or Reply.io?
Hyperbound scores highest overall in our ratings (Apollo.io 4.0/5, Hyperbound 4.1/5 and Reply.io 3.7/5). Apollo.io is best for finding business emails and phone numbers and Building B2B lead lists. Hyperbound is best for practising cold calls before going live and onboarding new sales reps faster. Reply.io is best for cold email campaigns and email plus LinkedIn sequences.
Which is cheaper, Apollo.io, Hyperbound or Reply.io?
Apollo.io: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/seat/mo. Hyperbound: It's free to use. Reply.io: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at From $49/user/mo.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Sales & Customer Support in the library.
