Side-by-side comparison · Sales & Customer Support
Apollo.io vs Chatbase vs Intercom
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Founders, small sales teams and marketers who need to find B2B contacts and email them.
Pick it if: Small businesses and online stores that want an AI chatbot answering questions on their website without hiring a developer.
Pick it if: Online businesses and software companies with a support team that wants an AI agent to take the first pass at every question.
Intercom scores highest overall, but Apollo.io gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Chatbase | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | B2B contact database with emails and phone numbers, plus sequences to reach them. | Puts an AI chatbot on your website that answers from your own docs and pages. | Customer support inbox, help centre and chat, with the Fin AI agent answering first. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $49/seat/mo | $32/mo | $0.99 per outcome |
| Free plan | Yes | No | No |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Chatbase | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 3.7 | 4.2Winner |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 3.5 | 5.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Chatbase | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | No | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | – | Yes |
| Desktop app | – | – | – |
| Browser extension | Yes | – | – |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | – | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | Yes |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | – | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | – | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 8/ 17 | 8/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Chatbase | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Founders testing outbound. | Hobby $32/mo billed yearly, or $40 monthly A small site with light chat traffic. | Fin on its own $0.99 per outcome, monthly minimum Teams happy with their current helpdesk who want the AI agent only. |
Basic $49/seat/mo billed yearly Individual sellers doing regular outbound. | StandardOur pick $120/mo billed yearly, or $150 monthly Businesses with steady daily chats. | Essential $29/seat/mo, plus $0.99 per Fin outcome Small teams starting out with live chat and an AI agent. | |
ProfessionalOur pick $79/seat/mo billed yearly Full-time reps. | Pro $400/mo billed yearly, or $500 monthly Busy sites and support teams. | AdvancedOur pick $85/seat/mo, plus $0.99 per Fin outcome Growing support teams that need automation and several inboxes. | |
Organization $119/seat/mo billed yearly (min 3 seats) Sales teams wanting advanced controls. | Enterprise Custom Larger companies needing security and white-labelling. | Expert $132/seat/mo, plus $0.99 per Fin outcome Larger teams with security and multi-brand needs. | |
| Which plan to pick | Start on Free to check the data covers your market. Basic suits one person prospecting; Professional is worth it if you also call prospects or want AI scoring. Monthly billing costs noticeably more than the yearly prices shown. | Start on the 7-day trial and watch how fast credits go with your real traffic. Hobby works for a small site; most businesses with daily customer chats need Standard. Each extra agent is $300 a year, and removing the Chatbase badge is $1,188 a year. | Start the 14-day trial and see how many conversations Fin handles, because that number drives the bill more than seats do. Most teams with more than a couple of agents end up on Advanced for the workflows. If you already run Zendesk or Salesforce and like it, try Fin on its own first. |
Key features
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Chatbase | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Chatbase | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Apollo.io | Chatbase | Intercom |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apollo.io, Chatbase or Intercom?
Intercom scores highest overall in our ratings (Apollo.io 4.0/5, Chatbase 3.7/5 and Intercom 4.2/5). Apollo.io is best for finding business emails and phone numbers and Building B2B lead lists. Chatbase is best for Website FAQ and support chatbot and answering questions from your docs and policies. Intercom is best for answering common customer questions automatically and website and in-app live chat.
Which is cheaper, Apollo.io, Chatbase or Intercom?
Apollo.io: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/seat/mo. Chatbase: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $32/mo. Intercom: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $0.99 per outcome.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Sales & Customer Support in the library.
