Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows

Activepieces vs Make vs Relevance AI

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Activepieces

4.0

From $20/mo flat

Best overall

Make

4.3

From From $9/mo

Relevance AI

3.7

Free to start

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Small teams who like how Zapier works but want to own their automations or avoid per-task pricing.

Make4.3
Best overall

Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.

Pick it if: Sales and revenue operations teams at growing companies who want AI agents doing research, prep and admin.

Overview

AttributeActivepiecesMakeRelevance AI
In one lineA Zapier-style automation builder that's open source and charges per run, not per step.Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges.Build a team of AI agents for sales, support and ops work, without writing code.
Pricing modelOpen sourceFreemiumPaid
Starting price$20/mo flatFrom $9/moSee website
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeActivepiecesMakeRelevance AI
Overall rating4.04.3Winner3.7
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
4.5
3.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeActivepiecesMakeRelevance AI
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app No––
Desktop app No No–
Browser extension No Yes–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted Yes No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images–––
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes No–
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style No No–
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score10/ 179/ 177/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeActivepiecesMakeRelevance AI
Plans

Free

Free

Small teams getting started, or anyone who will self-host.

Free

Free

Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios.

EnterpriseOur pick

Custom

Teams rolling out agents across a department.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo flat

A small business running automations every day.

CoreOur pick

From $9/mo billed yearly

One person automating a small business.

Team

$200/mo flat

A larger team that needs SSO and roles.

Pro

From $16/mo billed yearly

Anyone whose automations have become business-critical.

Ultimate

Custom

Companies with heavy volume or strict security needs.

Teams

From $29/mo billed yearly

A team sharing scenarios and connections.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee.

Which plan to pickThe Free plan is unusually generous, so start there. Move to Plus when you want monthly credits instead of a daily cap and the option to use your own AI keys. Self-host only if someone on the team is happy running a server.Core is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs.There is only one public option now: talk to sales for an Enterprise quote. Ask for a usage cap and clear reporting on credit spend in the contract.

Key features

AttributeActivepiecesMakeRelevance AI
Standout features
  • Zapier-style builder
  • Flat per-run pricing
  • Self-host or cloud
  • MCP for AI assistants
  • Agents and Tables
  • Bring your own AI keys
  • Visual canvas
  • Routers, filters and iterators
  • Run history you can replay
  • AI Agents
  • Make Grid
  • HTTP and webhooks
  • No-code agent builder
  • Ready-made sales agents
  • Human approvals
  • Testing and monitoring
  • Large integration library
  • API and MCP

Pros and cons

AttributeActivepiecesMakeRelevance AI
Pros
  • Easiest open-source automation tool to learn
  • Flat pricing, with one credit per run however long the flow
  • Generous free plan and free self-hosting
  • MCP makes every connected app available to Claude
  • Open source, so you can inspect or extend it
  • Much cheaper per step than Zapier
  • Branching, loops and filters are built in, not bolted on
  • Run history shows exactly what happened at every step
  • Routers and error handlers do not use credits
  • Generous free plan for learning
  • Ready-made sales agents save setup time
  • Good controls for approvals, testing and monitoring
  • Wide range of integrations
  • Used by large, well-known companies
Cons
  • Far fewer apps than Zapier, and some pieces are thin
  • Smaller community and fewer templates than n8n
  • No canvas, so complex branching is harder to follow
  • AI steps cost extra credits on top of the run
  • Steeper learning curve than Zapier, especially around data mapping
  • Credit usage is hard to predict until you have run a scenario for a while
  • Fewer apps than Zapier, and some apps have thin coverage
  • Pricing page is hard to read, and the headline prices assume yearly billing
  • No public self-serve pricing any more
  • Credit use is hard to predict and audit
  • Agents can stall mid-task and need watching
  • Fast-changing product and docs make it harder to learn

Who each one is for

AttributeActivepiecesMakeRelevance AI
Best for
  • Zapier-style automations on a budget
  • Giving AI assistants access to your apps
  • Long multi-step workflows
  • Self-hosted automation for teams
  • Multi-step marketing workflows
  • Branching logic and filters
  • Processing batches of records
  • Automation on a budget
  • Sales research and meeting prep
  • Post-call follow-ups and CRM updates
  • Teams running many agents with approvals
  • Companies wanting governance over AI agents
You'll find it used by
  • Small teams
  • Ops teams
  • Developers
  • Agencies
  • Marketers
  • Ops teams
  • Agencies
  • Consultants
  • Sales teams
  • Revenue operations
  • Customer success
  • Operations teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Activepieces, Make or Relevance AI?

Make scores highest overall in our ratings (Activepieces 4.0/5, Make 4.3/5 and Relevance AI 3.7/5). Activepieces is best for zapier-style automations on a budget and Giving AI assistants access to your apps. Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. Relevance AI is best for sales research and meeting prep and post-call follow-ups and CRM updates.

Which is cheaper, Activepieces, Make or Relevance AI?

Activepieces: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo flat. Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. Relevance AI: Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.