Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Pitch vs Quadratic

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Pitch

4.0

From €10/mo

Quadratic

4.0

From $18/user/mo

Comparing 2 tools. Add one more if you like.

At a glance

Easiest to use

Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.

Pick it if: Analysts, finance staff and founders who outgrow Excel and want AI to write the analysis in a sheet they can check.

Overview

AttributePitchQuadratic
In one lineCollaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking.A spreadsheet where AI writes the formulas, Python and SQL to analyse your data.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starting price€10/mo$18/user/mo
Free plan Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributePitchQuadratic
Overall rating4.04.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributePitchQuadratic
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes No
Desktop app Yes No
Browser extension No–
API access No Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes
Understands images––
Makes images Yes No
Makes video No No
Writes code No Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes–
Works in many languages Yes–
Capabilities score10/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributePitchQuadratic
Plans

Free

Free

Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out.

Personal

Free

Trying it out or light personal analysis.

PlusOur pick

€10/mo billed yearly

One person who sends decks to clients.

ProOur pick

$18/user/mo billed yearly

Individuals and small teams doing regular analysis.

Team

€15/seat/mo billed yearly

Small teams building decks together.

Business

$36/user/mo billed yearly

Teams that lean on the AI every day.

Business

€20/seat/mo billed yearly

Larger teams sending lots of decks.

Enterprise

Custom

Larger companies with security and hosting rules.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs.

Which plan to pickStart on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking.Start on the free Personal plan with a real data set. If you use it every week, Pro is enough for most people; move to Business only if you keep running out of AI credits. Monthly billing costs about 10% more than the yearly prices shown.

Key features

AttributePitchQuadratic
Standout features
  • Live collaboration
  • AI first drafts
  • Custom templates
  • Pitch rooms and advanced links
  • Exports
  • Desktop and mobile apps
  • AI analyst
  • Code in any cell
  • Database and app connections
  • Large files
  • PDF extraction
  • MCP and API

Pros and cons

AttributePitchQuadratic
Pros
  • Best collaboration features in the category
  • Templates and brand controls that non-designers can follow
  • Viewer analytics tell you what happens after you hit send
  • Free plan is enough for small teams to work in
  • Desktop apps and a clean, fast editor
  • Every AI answer stays as formulas or code you can check and edit
  • Python, SQL, JavaScript and formulas in one grid
  • Direct database connections, no exporting CSVs
  • Handles much larger data sets than Excel or Google Sheets
  • Useful free plan and fair entry price
  • MCP server and API, so Claude can work with your sheets
Cons
  • AI credits are modest and the free batch never renews
  • Free plan exports carry Pitch branding and skip PowerPoint
  • Pricing is in euros, so your bill moves with the exchange rate
  • Fewer AI design flourishes than Gamma, so drafts need more hands-on work
  • Much more useful if you can read some Python or SQL
  • Overkill if you only need help with the odd formula
  • AI credits run out quickly for heavy users
  • Small community, so fewer templates and tutorials than Excel or Sheets
  • Few independent reviews yet, as it is a newer product

Who each one is for

AttributePitchQuadratic
Best for
  • Fundraising and sales decks
  • Collaborative editing
  • Tracking who viewed a deck
  • Branded team templates
  • Asking questions of large data sets in plain English
  • Pulling live data from a company database
  • Python and SQL analysis without a separate notebook
  • Extracting tables from PDFs into a sheet
  • Auditable reports and models
You'll find it used by
  • Startups
  • Sales teams
  • Agencies
  • Marketers
  • Data analysts
  • Finance teams
  • Founders
  • Operations managers
  • Researchers

Questions people ask

Which is better, Pitch or Quadratic?

They tie on our overall rating (Pitch 4.0/5 and Quadratic 4.0/5). Pitch is best for fundraising and sales decks and collaborative editing. Quadratic is best for asking questions of large data sets in plain English and pulling live data from a company database.

Which is cheaper, Pitch or Quadratic?

Pitch: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €10/mo. Quadratic: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $18/user/mo.

Which is easier to use, Pitch or Quadratic?

Pitch rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.