Side-by-side comparison · Automation & Workflows
Make vs n8n vs Relevance AI
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.
Pick it if: Teams that want full control of their data and automations, or anyone building AI agents on a budget who doesn't mind getting a bit technical.
Pick it if: Sales and revenue operations teams at growing companies who want AI agents doing research, prep and admin.
Overview
| Attribute | Make | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Draw automations as a flowchart, with branches and loops, for less than Zapier charges. | Build automations and AI agents on a visual canvas, then host them yourself for free. | Build a team of AI agents for sales, support and ops work, without writing code. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Open source | Paid |
| Starting price | From $9/mo | €20/mo | See website |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Make | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.5Winner | 3.7 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.5 | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Make | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | – | No | – |
| Desktop app | No | No | – |
| Browser extension | Yes | No | – |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | Yes | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | Yes | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | Yes | – |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | No | No | – |
| Works in many languages | Yes | – | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 9/ 17 | 10/ 17 | 7/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Make | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Learning the canvas and running a couple of light scenarios. | Community Edition Free (self-hosted) Anyone comfortable running software on a server. | EnterpriseOur pick Custom Teams rolling out agents across a department. |
CoreOur pick From $9/mo billed yearly One person automating a small business. | StarterOur pick €20/mo billed yearly A small business that wants n8n hosted for them. | ||
Pro From $16/mo billed yearly Anyone whose automations have become business-critical. | Pro €50/mo billed yearly Teams running several business-critical workflows. | ||
Teams From $29/mo billed yearly A team sharing scenarios and connections. | Business €667/mo billed yearly Larger teams that need SSO and version control, self-hosted. | ||
Enterprise Custom Companies that need SSO, audit logs and an uptime guarantee. | Enterprise Custom Companies that need an SLA and dedicated support. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Core is enough for most small businesses, and 10,000 credits goes a long way when routers and error handlers are free. Move to Pro if a failed run costs you money and you want priority execution and better logs. | If you have anyone technical on hand, self-host the Community Edition on a small server and pay nothing. Otherwise Starter on the cloud is the right place to begin, and 2,500 executions covers a lot when each run of a long workflow counts as one. | There is only one public option now: talk to sales for an Enterprise quote. Ask for a usage cap and clear reporting on credit spend in the contract. |
Key features
| Attribute | Make | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Make | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Make | n8n | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Make, n8n or Relevance AI?
n8n scores highest overall in our ratings (Make 4.3/5, n8n 4.5/5 and Relevance AI 3.7/5). Make is best for multi-step marketing workflows and branching logic and filters. n8n is best for AI agents that act on email or chat and self-hosted automation. Relevance AI is best for sales research and meeting prep and post-call follow-ups and CRM updates.
Which is cheaper, Make, n8n or Relevance AI?
Make: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $9/mo. n8n: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €20/mo. Relevance AI: Pricing isn't published; check the vendor's site for a quote.
Which is easier to use, Make, n8n or Relevance AI?
Make rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Marketers and operators who've outgrown simple automations and want to see what their workflows are doing.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Automation & Workflows in the library.
