Side-by-side comparison · Writing & Translation
Grammarly vs Rytr
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 2 tools. Add one more if you like.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone who writes emails, documents and messages at work and wants mistakes caught and tone checked before they hit send.
Pick it if: Solo founders and small businesses on a tight budget who want quick emails and posts, and help keeping on top of follow-ups.
Grammarly scores highest overall, but Rytr gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Grammarly | Rytr |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3Winner | 3.8 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Grammarly | Rytr |
|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | ||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | Yes | – |
| Browser extension | Yes | Yes |
| API access | – | No |
| Teams & business | ||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No |
| AI abilities | ||
| Works with your files | – | – |
| Understands images | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No |
| Writes code | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | – | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | – | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 8/ 17 | 8/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Grammarly | Rytr |
|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free Basic spelling and grammar checks. | Free $0 Trying the writer. |
ProOur pick $12/member/mo billed yearly, or about $30 monthly Anyone who writes a lot at work, alone or in a team. | LiteOur pick $9/mo People who just want the writer. | |
Enterprise Custom Large organisations with security needs. | Personal $19/mo Using the follow-up assistant day to day. | |
Pro $49/mo People managing lots of clients. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Free is enough for typo-catching. If you write for clients or customers every day, Pro on yearly billing is good value; paying monthly costs more than double. | If you only want the writer, Lite at $9 a month is the one. Pick Personal or Pro only if the follow-up assistant earns its keep. Yearly billing saves 20%. |
Key features
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Grammarly | Rytr |
|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Grammarly | Rytr |
|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Grammarly or Rytr?
Grammarly scores highest overall in our ratings (Grammarly 4.3/5 and Rytr 3.8/5). Grammarly is best for proofreading emails and documents as you type and checking tone before a tricky message goes out. Rytr is best for quick emails and social posts on a budget and writing in your own voice or a set tone.
Which is cheaper, Grammarly or Rytr?
Grammarly: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $12/member/mo. Rytr: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0.
Which is easier to use, Grammarly or Rytr?
Grammarly rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who writes emails, documents and messages at work and wants mistakes caught and tone checked before they hit send.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Writing & Translation in the library.
