Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs
GPT for Work vs Plus AI vs Presentations.AI
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Marketers, ecommerce teams and operations staff who do the same text job across hundreds of spreadsheet rows.
Pick it if: Consultants, salespeople and marketers who build decks in Google Slides or PowerPoint every week.
Pick it if: Sales teams, founders and marketers who make business decks often and want them on brand without a designer.
Overview
| Attribute | GPT for Work | Plus AI | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | AI functions and bulk AI jobs inside Google Sheets and Excel, plus Docs and Word. | Makes and edits slides with AI inside Google Slides and PowerPoint. | Makes on-brand slide decks from a prompt or document, and tracks who views them. |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting price | $25/mo | $10/mo | $0 |
| Free plan | No | No | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | GPT for Work | Plus AI | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2Winner | 4.0 | 3.6 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 3.5 | 3.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | GPT for Work | Plus AI | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | No | No | Yes |
| Mobile app | – | – | No |
| Desktop app | – | – | No |
| Browser extension | – | No | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | – |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | – | – |
| Makes images | No | Yes | Yes |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | – | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | – | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | Yes | Yes |
| Works in many languages | Yes | – | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 7/ 17 | 7/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | GPT for Work | Plus AI | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | StandardOur pick $25/mo One person running bulk jobs. | Basic $10/mo billed yearly, or $15 monthly Occasional decks for one person. | Starter $0 Trying a deck or two. |
Business $45/seat/mo Teams sharing a budget. | ProOur pick $20/mo billed yearly, or $25 monthly People who build decks every week. | ProOur pick $20/mo billed yearly ($240) People who present regularly. | |
Enterprise Custom Large organisations. | Team $30/mo billed yearly, or $40 monthly Teams that need on-brand decks. | Gold $100/mo billed yearly ($1,200) Teams where decks win or lose deals. | |
Max $200/mo billed yearly, or $240 monthly Heavy users who don't want to count credits. | |||
Enterprise Custom Large companies. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Standard covers most individuals; watch the usage dashboard on your first big job. Move to Business when several people need it or you want to run it on your own AI account. | Pro is the sweet spot for most people because it adds document uploads and the MCP server. Move to Team only when several people need decks on the same brand template. Prices are per user. | Make one real deck on Starter. If it beats your current process, Pro covers most people. Gold only makes sense for teams that need custom templates and a shared knowledge base. Compare it with Gamma before paying for a year. |
Key features
| Attribute | GPT for Work | Plus AI | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | GPT for Work | Plus AI | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | GPT for Work | Plus AI | Presentations.AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, GPT for Work, Plus AI or Presentations.AI?
GPT for Work scores highest overall in our ratings (GPT for Work 4.2/5, Plus AI 4.0/5 and Presentations.AI 3.6/5). GPT for Work is best for Bulk AI jobs across spreadsheet rows and categorising and tagging data. Plus AI is best for decks that must stay in Google Slides or PowerPoint and turning a document into slides. Presentations.AI is best for sales and pitch decks and turning a document into slides.
Which is cheaper, GPT for Work, Plus AI or Presentations.AI?
GPT for Work: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $25/mo. Plus AI: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $10/mo. Presentations.AI: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0.
Which is easier to use, GPT for Work, Plus AI or Presentations.AI?
Plus AI rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Consultants, salespeople and marketers who build decks in Google Slides or PowerPoint every week.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.
