Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Research & Search

Elicit vs NotebookLM vs Consensus

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Elicit

3.8

From $49/user/mo

Best overall

NotebookLM

4.5

From $4.99/mo

Consensus

4.1

From $20/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Elicit

3.8

Pick it if: Researchers, students and analysts who need to review a lot of papers carefully.

NotebookLM

4.5
Best overallBest valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who needs to understand or explain a set of documents they don't have time to read properly.

Consensus

4.1

Pick it if: Anyone who wants to know whether something is backed by actual studies before repeating it.

Overview

AttributeElicitNotebookLMConsensus
In one lineFinds, screens and summarises research papers into a comparison table.Upload your own documents and ask questions that only draw on those sources.Searches academic papers and tells you what the evidence actually says.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$49/user/mo$4.99/mo$20/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeElicitNotebookLMConsensus
Overall rating3.84.5Winner4.1
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
5.0
4.5
FeaturesHow much it can do, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
3.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
5.0
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
4.0
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeElicitNotebookLMConsensus
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes–
Desktop app No No No
Browser extension No Yes–
API access Yes– Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes–
Understands images– Yes No
Makes images No Yes No
Makes video No Yes No
Writes code No No No
Runs agents or automations Yes No No
Learns your brand or style No No No
Works in many languages– Yes–
Capabilities score7/ 1711/ 175/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeElicitNotebookLMConsensus
Plans

Basic

Free

Searching and reading a few papers.

FreeOur pick

Free

Almost everyone. Try this before paying for anything.

Free

Free

Occasional fact-checking.

ProOur pick

$49/user/mo billed yearly

Anyone doing a real literature review.

Google AI Plus

$4.99/mo

People who hit the free limits now and then.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $12/mo billed yearly

Anyone who checks evidence weekly.

Scale

$169/user/mo billed yearly

Teams running many reviews at once.

Google AI Pro

$19.99/mo

Heavy users who also want Gemini Pro and Deep Research.

Deep

$65/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly

Researchers and clinicians doing frequent literature reviews.

Enterprise

Custom

Universities, pharma and large research groups.

Google AI Ultra

From $99.99/mo

Power users who want the top of everything Google offers.

Teams

Custom

Labs, departments and research groups.

Which plan to pickStay on Basic unless you have a review to run. When you do, Pro has everything one person needs, and the yearly commitment is the only way to get the quoted price. Scale is for teams, not for a solo researcher who wants more headroom.Stay on Free until it stops you doing something. If that happens, Google AI Pro is the sensible step because it also upgrades Gemini and Deep Research, which you will probably want anyway. AI Plus is a cheap middle step if NotebookLM is all you care about.Start on Free. If you find yourself rationing the 10 Pro messages, Pro billed yearly is good value at $12 a month. Deep is only for people whose job is literature reviews; most readers here will never need it.

Key features

AttributeElicitNotebookLMConsensus
Standout features
  • Research Reports
  • Extraction tables
  • Systematic Review workflow
  • Chat with papers
  • Routines
  • Library and sharing
  • Grounded answers
  • Many source types
  • Audio and Video Overviews
  • Studio outputs
  • Discover sources
  • Sharing
  • Consensus Meter
  • Pro messages
  • Deep reviews
  • Study Snapshots
  • Quality filters
  • API and MCP

Pros and cons

AttributeElicitNotebookLMConsensus
Pros
  • Extraction tables save days on a literature review
  • Every answer links back to the passage in the paper
  • Systematic review workflow records why papers were included or excluded
  • Routines keep a review current without you remembering to check
  • Free plan is useful for reading and summarising
  • Answers only from your sources and cites the exact passage
  • Free plan is big enough for most small businesses
  • Accepts PDFs, Docs, websites, YouTube and audio as sources
  • Audio Overviews are a clever way to get people to engage with research
  • Simple enough that you can hand it to anyone on the team
  • Consensus Meter gives an honest read on mixed evidence in seconds
  • Every summary links to the actual paper
  • Free plan is enough for occasional checks
  • Pro is cheap when billed yearly
  • Quality filters help you ignore weak studies
Cons
  • $49 a user a month is a lot for anyone outside research
  • Only academic papers; no business, news or grey literature
  • Extractions still need spot-checking against the source
  • Reports and large screens take a while to run
  • Collaboration is locked to the $169 Scale plan
  • Will not research the open web unless you explicitly ask it to find sources
  • Answers can be surface-level on dense material; you still need to read the key parts
  • Audio Overviews take a few minutes and sound alike after a while
  • No way to script or automate it; everything happens in the browser
  • Only covers academic research; no business or news sources
  • Can make thin or old evidence look more settled than it is
  • Monthly billing on Pro is nearly double the yearly rate
  • Deep review limits are low until you pay for the Deep plan

Who each one is for

AttributeElicitNotebookLMConsensus
Best for
  • Literature reviews
  • Extracting data from papers
  • Screening papers by criteria
  • Comparing studies in a table
  • Summarising long reports
  • Questioning a set of PDFs
  • Turning research into a podcast
  • Study guides and briefings
  • Fact-checking health claims
  • Finding studies on a topic
  • Evidence for a blog or pitch
  • Student literature reviews
You'll find it used by
  • Researchers
  • Analysts
  • Clinicians
  • Postgraduate students
  • Consultants
  • Marketers
  • Students
  • Small business owners
  • Health and wellness brands
  • Content marketers
  • Students
  • Clinicians

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability. The "Visit" buttons may use affiliate links, which never affect a score.

Swap in another tool

More research & search tools from the library.