Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Coding & Dev Tools

Cursor vs Kiro vs Zed

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Cursor

3.9

From $8/mo

Kiro

3.6

From $20/mo

Best overall

Zed

4.3

From $10/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Developers and curious beginners who want AI help but still want a visual editor.

Kiro3.6

Pick it if: Developers and technical founders who want a written plan before the AI builds anything, especially teams already on AWS.

Zed4.3
Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Developers who want a fast editor and already pay for Claude or another AI provider.

Overview

AttributeCursorKiroZed
In one lineA code editor with AI built in, for people who want to watch every change happen.Amazon's AI code editor that writes a plan and requirements before it writes any code.A fast, free, open-source code editor that runs Claude Code and other AI agents inside it.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumOpen source
Starting price$8/mo$20/mo$10/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeCursorKiroZed
Overall rating3.93.64.3Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.0
4.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers the job it's built for, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
3.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
3.0
3.0
5.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.0
5.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeCursorKiroZed
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes No
Desktop app Yes Yes Yes
Browser extension No No No
API access– No–
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score12/ 1712/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeCursorKiroZed
Plans

Free

Free

Trying the editor and a few agent runs.

Free

Free

Trying spec mode on a small project.

PersonalOur pick

Free

Almost everyone.

Plus

$8/mo

Light users who are happy with Grok models only.

ProOur pick

$20/mo

Most individuals using it a few days a week.

Pro

$10/mo

People who want Zed's hosted AI without managing keys.

PremiumOur pick

$30/mo

Most developers, especially if you want Claude alongside Grok.

Pro+

$40/mo

Regular daily users.

Business

$30/seat/mo

Teams that need spending and access controls.

Super or Ultra

$100/mo or $200/mo

Heavy daily agent users.

Pro Max

$100/mo

Professionals in Kiro for hours each day.

Legacy Pro

$20/mo

Existing subscribers only. New customers can't buy it.

Power

$200/mo

The heaviest users.

Teams

From $30/user/mo

Companies that need admin controls and SSO.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies that need SSO and central billing.

Which plan to pickIf you are on the old $20 Pro plan and it covers what you use, stay put; switching is permanent. New customers should skip Plus unless they are happy with Grok. Premium is the realistic starting point if you want Claude, and budget for the extra usage billing on top of the $30. Large companies can ask about a custom Enterprise plan.Pro at $20 is the place to start, and you get $20 off your first paid month when you upgrade. Use the Auto model to make credits last, and only move up a tier once you know your monthly usage.Personal. If you have Claude Pro, run Claude Code inside Zed and you are done. Pro only makes sense if you want Zed's built-in assistant and edit predictions without setting up API keys.

Key features

AttributeCursorKiroZed
Standout features
  • Tab autocomplete
  • Agent mode
  • Chat with your codebase
  • Cloud agents and automations
  • Rules
  • Built on VS Code
  • Specs
  • Vibe mode
  • Hooks
  • Workflows and Crew
  • Web and iPhone
  • Powers
  • Built for speed
  • External agents inside the editor
  • Bring your own keys
  • Edit predictions
  • Real-time collaboration
  • Open source

Pros and cons

AttributeCursorKiroZed
Pros
  • The clearest view of what an AI is doing to your code
  • Autocomplete is still the best in the category
  • Feels familiar instantly if you have used VS Code
  • Cloud agents and code review on the mid plans
  • Spec mode makes the AI's plan easy to read and change before it builds
  • One subscription covers editor, terminal, web and iPhone
  • Good choice for businesses already on AWS
  • Hooks and Powers automate a lot of busywork
  • Noticeably faster than VS Code and Cursor
  • Free, open source, and no charge for running your own agents
  • Clean agent panel that shows exactly what changed
  • Built-in real-time collaboration
Cons
  • Cheap plans only give you Grok models
  • Claude usage is billed on top of the subscription at API prices, so the real cost is hard to predict
  • OpenAI models are due to leave Cursor, which narrows the model choice
  • You now buy it bundled with Grok and X Premium, whether you want them or not
  • Agent runs are less thorough than Claude Code on big tasks
  • Credits run out fast on the best models, and multipliers have gone up
  • Workflows are slow, ask for approval constantly and burn credits
  • Free plan's 50 credits a month is very small
  • History of pricing changes, including a botched launch in 2025
  • Some users say its agent uses more tokens than Claude Code or Codex for the same job
  • Smaller extension library than VS Code or Cursor
  • Less hand-holding for beginners; it assumes you know your way around an editor
  • Business plan has no SSO yet, which rules it out for some companies
  • Its own hosted AI is basic compared with the agents you can bring

Who each one is for

AttributeCursorKiroZed
Best for
  • Editing with AI autocomplete
  • Learning by watching changes happen
  • Multi-file changes in agent mode
  • Developers who like VS Code
  • Turning a rough idea into requirements and a plan
  • Bigger features you want planned before building
  • Teams already on AWS
  • Automating checks with hooks
  • Running Claude Code inside an editor
  • Speed on big projects
  • Using your own AI subscription
  • Pairing with teammates in real time
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Startup teams
  • Students
  • Technical founders
  • Developers
  • AWS teams
  • Technical founders
  • Students
  • Developers
  • Claude Code users
  • Open source fans
  • Small teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Cursor, Kiro or Zed?

Zed scores highest overall in our ratings (Cursor 3.9/5, Kiro 3.6/5 and Zed 4.3/5). Cursor is best for editing with AI autocomplete and learning by watching changes happen. Kiro is best for turning a rough idea into requirements and a plan and bigger features you want planned before building. Zed is best for Running Claude Code inside an editor and speed on big projects.

Which is cheaper, Cursor, Kiro or Zed?

Cursor: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Kiro: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Zed: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $10/mo.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Coding & Dev Tools in the library.