Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · AI Assistants & LLMs

Claude vs LMArena vs Qwen Chat

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Claude

4.6

From $20/mo

LMArena

3.8

Free to start

Qwen Chat

4.0

From $4/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who writes, researches or makes decisions for a living, plus anyone curious about Claude Code.

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone choosing between AI tools, and people who want to know which model is leading right now.

Pick it if: Anyone after a capable free assistant with image, video, slides and website tools, and developers who want open models.

Claude scores highest overall, but LMArena gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeClaudeLMArenaQwen Chat
In one lineAnthropic's chat assistant, at its best on careful writing and long documents.Free site where you compare AI models side by side and see which ones people rate best.Alibaba's generous free assistant for research, slides, websites, images and video.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreeFreemium
Starting price$20/moFree$4/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeClaudeLMArenaQwen Chat
Overall rating4.6Winner3.84.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
3.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
4.0
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
5.0
3.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
5.0
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
3.0
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeClaudeLMArenaQwen Chat
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes No Yes
Desktop app Yes No No
Browser extension Yes No No
API access Yes No Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes No No
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes No No
Connects to other apps Yes No No
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images No Yes Yes
Makes video No Yes Yes
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes No Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes No No
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score14/ 177/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeClaudeLMArenaQwen Chat
Plans

Free

Free

Trying it out and light daily use.

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone.

FreeOur pick

Free

Most people. The free limits are generous for chat and research.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who uses it most days.

Go

$4/mo

Regular users who want higher chat limits.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users and people living in Claude Code.

Plus

$19/mo

Creators making images and video most days.

Team

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses with 2 to 150 people.

Pro

$99/mo

Heavy video and image users who need priority.

Which plan to pickStart on Free to see if the writing suits you. Most people who stick with it move to Pro within a month; only go to Max if you hit the Pro limits every day or you're running Claude Code for hours at a time.There's nothing to buy. Use it free, and pay for whichever assistant comes out best for your work.Start free; most people never need to pay. Go at $4 is cheap if you hit the chat limits. Prices are App Store prices, so check the in-app screen before you subscribe.

Key features

AttributeClaudeLMArenaQwen Chat
Standout features
  • Projects
  • Artifacts
  • Long documents
  • Web search and connectors
  • Tasks and Claude Code
  • Memory
  • Battle mode
  • Side by side
  • Direct chat
  • Leaderboards
  • Agent mode
  • Early access
  • Deep Research
  • Web Dev
  • Slides
  • Image and video
  • Thinking mode
  • Open models

Pros and cons

AttributeClaudeLMArenaQwen Chat
Pros
  • Writing sounds like a person and needs the least editing of any assistant
  • Handles long documents and messy briefs without losing track
  • Projects and memory mean you stop repeating the same context
  • Artifacts turn answers into real documents, slides and small apps
  • One subscription covers Claude Code as well
  • The free plan now includes memory, connectors and Artifacts
  • Free access to the leading models, often before release
  • Blind voting makes it easy to judge models on output alone
  • Leaderboards cover text, code, images, video and agents
  • Real people's preferences are harder to game than lab benchmarks
  • One of the most generous free plans in the category
  • Broad toolkit: research, slides, websites, images and video in one place
  • Top Qwen models rank near the best US models
  • Open models you can run yourself
  • International service is run from Singapore
Cons
  • Free and Pro usage limits can bite on a busy day
  • No image or video generation, which ChatGPT and Gemini both have
  • The free plan doesn't include the top Opus models
  • Fewer third-party connectors and plugins than ChatGPT
  • Rankings favour answers that look good, and labs have been caught testing private versions to climb the board
  • Conversations are collected and partly shared with model makers, so keep private work out
  • Frequent "something went wrong" errors, captchas, logouts and models removed without notice
  • Direct chat is being narrowed, with newer models only available in random battles
  • The company now sells evaluations to the labs it ranks, which raises questions about neutrality
  • Avoids or slants topics sensitive to the Chinese government
  • Thinking mode on the newest models can be very slow
  • Paid plans are new and the free limits aren't published, so it's unclear how long the free plan stays this generous
  • Chats can be used, de-identified, to improve the service; you have to email to opt out of training
  • No connections to business apps

Who each one is for

AttributeClaudeLMArenaQwen Chat
Best for
  • Long-form writing and editing
  • Reading and summarising long documents
  • Thinking through a plan or decision
  • Pairing with Claude Code
  • Choosing between AI models with your own prompts
  • Checking which model leads after a launch
  • Trying top models for free
  • Comparing image and video models
  • A free assistant that does a bit of everything
  • Quick webpages and slide decks from a prompt
  • Free image and short video generation
  • Deep research reports
  • Developers who want open models
You'll find it used by
  • Writers and marketers
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Developers
  • AI enthusiasts
  • Developers
  • Product teams
  • Journalists
  • Students
  • Developers
  • Budget-conscious founders
  • Content creators

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude, LMArena or Qwen Chat?

Claude scores highest overall in our ratings (Claude 4.6/5, LMArena 3.8/5 and Qwen Chat 4.0/5). Claude is best for long-form writing and editing and reading and summarising long documents. LMArena is best for choosing between AI models with your own prompts and checking which model leads after a launch. Qwen Chat is best for A free assistant that does a bit of everything and quick webpages and slide decks from a prompt.

Which is cheaper, Claude, LMArena or Qwen Chat?

Claude: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. LMArena: It's free to use. Qwen Chat: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $4/mo.

Which is easier to use, Claude, LMArena or Qwen Chat?

Claude rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who writes, researches or makes decisions for a living, plus anyone curious about Claude Code.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.