Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Presentations & Docs

Claude Docs & Slides vs Pitch vs Presentations.AI

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Claude Docs & Slides

4.0

From $20/mo

Pitch

4.0

From €10/mo

Presentations.AI

3.6

From $0

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who already uses Claude and wants the report or deck at the end of the chat, ready to share.

Pick it if: Startups and sales teams who build decks together and want to know what happens after they send them.

Pick it if: Sales teams, founders and marketers who make business decks often and want them on brand without a designer.

Overview

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesPitchPresentations.AI
In one lineAsk Claude for a document or deck, then edit, share and export it without leaving chat.Collaborative deck builder for teams, with AI drafts, shared templates and view tracking.Makes on-brand slide decks from a prompt or document, and tracks who views them.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumFreemium
Starting price$20/mo€10/mo$0
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesPitchPresentations.AI
Overall rating4.04.03.6
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
4.0
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.0
3.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.0
3.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
4.0
3.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
4.0
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesPitchPresentations.AI
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes Yes No
Desktop app Yes Yes No
Browser extension No No Yes
API access– No Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes–
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes––
Makes images No Yes Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes No No
Runs agents or automations Yes No Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score12/ 1710/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesPitchPresentations.AI
Plans

Free

Free

Trying a document or deck.

Free

Free

Individuals and teams of up to five trying it out.

Starter

$0

Trying a deck or two.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone making documents or decks most weeks.

PlusOur pick

€10/mo billed yearly

One person who sends decks to clients.

ProOur pick

$20/mo billed yearly ($240)

People who present regularly.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users who hit Pro limits.

Team

€15/seat/mo billed yearly

Small teams building decks together.

Gold

$100/mo billed yearly ($1,200)

Teams where decks win or lose deals.

Team

$25/seat/mo, or $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses sharing documents across a team.

Business

€20/seat/mo billed yearly

Larger teams sending lots of decks.

Enterprise

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly, plus usage

Larger organisations needing admin control.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies of 30 or more seats with security needs.

Which plan to pickIf you already pay for Claude, you have it. Try it on Free first, and move to Pro once you're making more than the odd document, because decks use up a Free allowance fast. Team makes sense when colleagues need to open and comment on the same documents.Start on Free, which is enough to decide if the editor suits you. A solo consultant should move to Plus for clean PowerPoint exports. A sales team of three or more should go straight to Team for the shared credits and viewer tracking.Make one real deck on Starter. If it beats your current process, Pro covers most people. Gold only makes sense for teams that need custom templates and a shared knowledge base. Compare it with Gamma before paying for a year.

Key features

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesPitchPresentations.AI
Standout features
  • Made in the chat
  • Built from your sources
  • Share and comment
  • Tables, charts and diagrams
  • Present or export
  • Scheduled reports
  • Live collaboration
  • AI first drafts
  • Custom templates
  • Pitch rooms and advanced links
  • Exports
  • Desktop and mobile apps
  • Deck from anything
  • Brand kit
  • PowerPoint and PDF export
  • Viewer analytics
  • Sharing controls
  • Chrome, ChatGPT and API

Pros and cons

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesPitchPresentations.AI
Pros
  • No extra subscription if you already use Claude, and Free can try it
  • The document or deck comes out of the same chat that did the research
  • Edit directly or by asking, without copying text into another app
  • Exports to the formats clients and colleagues already use
  • Report and deck stay consistent because they come from one conversation
  • Best collaboration features in the category
  • Templates and brand controls that non-designers can follow
  • Viewer analytics tell you what happens after you hit send
  • Free plan is enough for small teams to work in
  • Desktop apps and a clean, fast editor
  • Fast first drafts from a prompt, file or web page
  • Clean PowerPoint export
  • Slide-by-slide viewer analytics
  • Brand kit keeps decks consistent
  • API, Chrome extension and ChatGPT app
Cons
  • No brand templates in Slides, so decks look generic next to Claude Design or Gamma
  • Rewriting a long doc eats your Claude usage limits quickly, especially on Free and Pro
  • Rough edges on complex formatting, and co-editing and version history are lighter than Google Docs
  • Decks are starting to look recognisably "made by Claude" to clients
  • Sometimes makes a Claude Doc when you wanted a plain Word file, and docs don't flow back into Project knowledge
  • AI credits are modest and the free batch never renews
  • Free plan exports carry Pitch branding and skip PowerPoint
  • Pricing is in euros, so your bill moves with the exchange rate
  • Fewer AI design flourishes than Gamma, so drafts need more hands-on work
  • Yearly billing only on the pricing page
  • Free plan is small, with 200 credits and 20 slides
  • Big jump in price from Pro to Gold
  • Gamma covers the same ground and is better known

Who each one is for

AttributeClaude Docs & SlidesPitchPresentations.AI
Best for
  • Reports and proposals from research
  • Quick internal decks
  • Weekly reports on a schedule
  • SOPs and how-to guides
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Fundraising and sales decks
  • Collaborative editing
  • Tracking who viewed a deck
  • Branded team templates
  • Sales and pitch decks
  • Turning a document into slides
  • Keeping decks on brand
  • Seeing who read your deck
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Operations managers
  • Marketers
  • Startups
  • Sales teams
  • Agencies
  • Marketers
  • Sales teams
  • Founders
  • Marketers
  • Consultants
  • Product teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Docs & Slides, Pitch or Presentations.AI?

They tie on our overall rating (Claude Docs & Slides 4.0/5, Pitch 4.0/5 and Presentations.AI 3.6/5). Claude Docs & Slides is best for reports and proposals from research and quick internal decks. Pitch is best for fundraising and sales decks and collaborative editing. Presentations.AI is best for sales and pitch decks and turning a document into slides.

Which is cheaper, Claude Docs & Slides, Pitch or Presentations.AI?

Claude Docs & Slides: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Pitch: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at €10/mo. Presentations.AI: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0.

Which is easier to use, Claude Docs & Slides, Pitch or Presentations.AI?

Claude Docs & Slides rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who already uses Claude and wants the report or deck at the end of the chat, ready to share.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Presentations & Docs in the library.