Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · AI Assistants & LLMs

ChatGPT vs Claude vs Langdock

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

ChatGPT

4.3

From $8/mo

Best overall

Claude

4.6

From $20/mo

Langdock

4.2

From €25/user/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Pick it if: Anyone who wants one general-purpose assistant that handles most everyday jobs.

Best overallBest value

Pick it if: Anyone who writes, researches or makes decisions for a living, plus anyone curious about Claude Code.

Pick it if: European mid-size companies that want to roll out AI to every employee with multiple models and strict data controls.

Overview

AttributeChatGPTClaudeLangdock
In one lineOpenAI's all-rounder: chat, images, voice, web search and agents in one app.Anthropic's chat assistant, at its best on careful writing and long documents.A company-wide ChatGPT-style workspace with many AI models, agents and EU hosting.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumPaid
Starting price$8/mo$20/mo€25/user/mo
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code No Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeChatGPTClaudeLangdock
Overall rating4.34.6Winner4.2
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
4.5
4.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
5.0
4.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
5.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
4.5
4.0

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeChatGPTClaudeLangdock
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app Yes Yes–
Desktop app Yes Yes–
Browser extension Yes Yes–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes Yes
Makes images Yes No Yes
Makes video No No No
Writes code Yes Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes–
Works in many languages Yes Yes Yes
Capabilities score15/ 1714/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeChatGPTClaudeLangdock
Plans

Free

Free

Trying it out and everyday questions.

Free

Free

Trying it out and light daily use.

Trial

Free for 7 days

Testing with a few colleagues.

Go

$8/mo

Casual users who hit the free limits.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who uses it most days.

Business (Standard seat)Our pick

€25/user/mo

Most staff in a company rollout.

PlusOur pick

$20/mo

Anyone using it most days for work.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users and people living in Claude Code.

Business (Max seat)

€99/user/mo

Heavy users who hit limits.

Pro

From $100/mo

Heavy users and people living in Codex.

Team

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses with 2 to 150 people.

Enterprise

Custom

Companies over 1,000 users.

Business

See website

Teams from 2 people up.

Which plan to pickThe free plan is now good enough to use properly, so stay on it until the image, voice or research limits annoy you. Plus is the sensible upgrade. Only look at Pro if you run Codex or deep research all day, and read the current tier details first: Pro 200 now comes with a smaller allowance than it did before 29 September.Start on Free to see if the writing suits you. Most people who stick with it move to Pro within a month; only go to Max if you hit the Pro limits every day or you're running Claude Code for hours at a time.Give most staff Standard seats and buy Max seats only for the few who use AI all day. Yearly billing saves about 20%, and seat prices drop with volume.

Key features

AttributeChatGPTClaudeLangdock
Standout features
  • Image generation and editing
  • Voice mode
  • Deep research
  • ChatGPT Work
  • Plugins and connectors
  • Codex and Sites
  • Projects
  • Artifacts
  • Long documents
  • Web search and connectors
  • Tasks and Claude Code
  • Memory
  • Chat with any model
  • Shared agents
  • Company data connections
  • Workflows
  • EU hosting and admin controls
  • API

Pros and cons

AttributeChatGPTClaudeLangdock
Pros
  • The widest set of built-in tools of any assistant
  • Free plan includes unlimited text chat with GPT-6 Luna
  • Image generation and voice mode are the best in the category
  • Huge ecosystem of plugins, connectors and guides
  • One subscription covers the Codex coding agent too
  • Writing sounds like a person and needs the least editing of any assistant
  • Handles long documents and messy briefs without losing track
  • Projects and memory mean you stop repeating the same context
  • Artifacts turn answers into real documents, slides and small apps
  • One subscription covers Claude Code as well
  • The free plan now includes memory, connectors and Artifacts
  • Many top models under one login, no vendor lock-in
  • EU hosting and GDPR compliance suit European legal teams
  • Easy for non-technical staff to pick up
  • Agents and workflows in the same platform
Cons
  • Writing sounds generic unless you work hard on the prompt
  • Plans and limits change often, and Pro now runs to $500 a month
  • Free and Go plans may show ads
  • It's confident when it's wrong, so check facts before you publish
  • Custom GPTs are being retired, so anything built on them needs moving to plugins
  • Free and Pro usage limits can bite on a busy day
  • No image or video generation, which ChatGPT and Gemini both have
  • The free plan doesn't include the top Opus models
  • Fewer third-party connectors and plugins than ChatGPT
  • Workflows beyond the included runs and API use cost extra
  • Euro pricing only
  • Small base of public reviews so far
  • Some connectors have gaps, such as Google Drive search limited to files you own

Who each one is for

AttributeChatGPTClaudeLangdock
Best for
  • Everyday questions and brainstorming
  • Making and editing images in the chat
  • Voice conversations on your phone
  • Quick research with web search
  • Long-form writing and editing
  • Reading and summarising long documents
  • Thinking through a plan or decision
  • Pairing with Claude Code
  • Rolling out AI to a whole company in the EU
  • Using several AI models under one login
  • Shared agents for HR, sales and support teams
  • Companies with strict GDPR requirements
You'll find it used by
  • Marketers
  • Small business owners
  • Students
  • Developers
  • Writers and marketers
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Developers
  • European businesses
  • HR teams
  • Sales teams
  • IT and security teams
  • Operations teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, ChatGPT, Claude or Langdock?

Claude scores highest overall in our ratings (ChatGPT 4.3/5, Claude 4.6/5 and Langdock 4.2/5). ChatGPT is best for everyday questions and brainstorming and making and editing images in the chat. Claude is best for long-form writing and editing and reading and summarising long documents. Langdock is best for rolling out AI to a whole company in the EU and using several AI models under one login.

Which is cheaper, ChatGPT, Claude or Langdock?

ChatGPT: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Claude: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Langdock: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at €25/user/mo.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.