Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison ยท Image, Logo & Design

ChatGPT Images vs Lovart

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

ChatGPT Images

4.2

Free to start

Lovart

3.9

From $0

Comparing 2 tools. Add one more if you like.

At a glance

Best overallBest valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who already uses ChatGPT and wants quick, accurate images without learning another tool.

Pick it if: Small business owners, marketers and designers who want a full set of on-brand designs without briefing a designer for every piece.

Overview

AttributeChatGPT ImagesLovart
In one lineMake and edit images inside ChatGPT by describing what you want, words included.An AI design agent that makes brand kits, posters, ads and social sets from one brief.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFree$0
Free plan Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code No No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeChatGPT ImagesLovart
Overall rating4.2Winner3.9
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
5.0
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
3.5
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeChatGPT ImagesLovart
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes
Mobile app Yes No
Desktop app Yes No
Browser extension Yes No
API access Yes No
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes No
Connects to other apps Yes No
Open source or self-hosted No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes
Understands images Yes Yes
Makes images Yes Yes
Makes video Yes Yes
Writes code Yes No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style Yes Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes
Capabilities score16/ 179/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeChatGPT ImagesLovart
Plans

Free

Free

A few images a day.

Free

$0

Trying a few designs.

Go

See website

Light users who hit the free limits.

Starter

$19/mo, or $16/mo billed yearly

Occasional design jobs.

PlusOur pick

See website

Most marketers and business owners.

BasicOur pick

$32/mo, or $27/mo billed yearly

A small business making designs every week.

Pro

See website

Heavy daily users.

Pro

$90/mo, or $45/mo billed yearly in year one

Marketers making lots of content.

Business

See website

Teams who need shared workspaces and admin.

Ultimate

$199/mo, or $109/mo billed yearly in year one

Agencies and heavy users.

Which plan to pickFree is enough to find out if the quality suits you. Plus is the one to buy if you make images most days, because the limits stop getting in the way and you get the whole assistant too. Pro is only for people living in ChatGPT all day.Try the free plan with one real brief. Basic suits most small businesses making designs every week. Before you take a big yearly discount on Pro or Ultimate, check the renewal price for year two. There's a separate Team plan for shared use.

Key features

AttributeChatGPT ImagesLovart
Standout features
  • Edit by conversation
  • Accurate text
  • Reference images
  • Thinking mode
  • Lives inside ChatGPT
  • API as gpt-image-2
  • Design agent
  • Brand kits
  • Point-and-edit canvas
  • Many models
  • Delegated tasks
  • Commercial licence

Pros and cons

AttributeChatGPT ImagesLovart
Pros
  • No learning curve: describe it, then describe the fix
  • Reliable text and faithful use of your logo and product photos
  • Included in every ChatGPT plan, including Free
  • Handles many languages well
  • Thinking mode makes complex layouts and infographics workable
  • Plans a whole design job from one brief
  • Brand kits keep everything consistent
  • Many top image and video models in one subscription
  • Commercial licence on paid plans
  • Edit by pointing at the canvas
Cons
  • Slower than dedicated generators
  • Free plan limits run out quickly on a busy day
  • Less distinctive artistic style than Midjourney
  • Limited fine control over composition compared with a design tool
  • No vector output
  • Credits run out quickly on video and 4K images
  • Big first-year discounts renew at higher prices
  • Free plan is very limited
  • Agent features like delegated tasks are still in beta

Who each one is for

AttributeChatGPT ImagesLovart
Best for
  • Mockups and signage with real text
  • Editing an image by describing changes
  • Social tiles and quick marketing visuals
  • Multilingual text in images
  • Creating a brand kit for a new business
  • Batches of on-brand social posts and ads
  • Posters, flyers and packaging ideas
  • Product photos and short promo videos
You'll find it used by
  • Small business owners
  • Marketers
  • Product teams
  • Anyone on ChatGPT
  • Small businesses
  • Marketers
  • Designers
  • Online stores
  • Agencies

Questions people ask

Which is better, ChatGPT Images or Lovart?

ChatGPT Images scores highest overall in our ratings (ChatGPT Images 4.2/5 and Lovart 3.9/5). ChatGPT Images is best for mockups and signage with real text and editing an image by describing changes. Lovart is best for creating a brand kit for a new business and batches of on-brand social posts and ads.

Which is cheaper, ChatGPT Images or Lovart?

ChatGPT Images: It's free to use. Lovart: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0.

Which is easier to use, ChatGPT Images or Lovart?

ChatGPT Images rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who already uses ChatGPT and wants quick, accurate images without learning another tool.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Image, Logo & Design in the library.