Side-by-side comparison · Image, Logo & Design
ChatGPT Images vs Figma vs FLUX
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone who already uses ChatGPT and wants quick, accurate images without learning another tool.
Pick it if: Founders and teams designing a website, app or product, or working closely with developers.
Pick it if: Developers, designers and hands-on marketers who want precise, cheap image generation and editing without a subscription.
ChatGPT Images scores highest overall, but FLUX gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.
Overview
| Attribute | ChatGPT Images | Figma | FLUX |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Make and edit images inside ChatGPT by describing what you want, words included. | The design tool product teams use, now able to turn a prompt into a working prototype. | Black Forest Labs' image models: pay per image in the browser or run them free yourself. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | $16/mo per full seat | From $0.041 per image |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | No | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | ChatGPT Images | Figma | FLUX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2Winner | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 5.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | ChatGPT Images | Figma | FLUX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | Yes | Yes | No |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes | No |
| Browser extension | Yes | No | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | Yes |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makes images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Makes video | Yes | No | Yes |
| Writes code | Yes | Yes | No |
| Runs agents or automations | Yes | No | No |
| Learns your brand or style | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 16/ 17 | 13/ 17 | 10/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | ChatGPT Images | Figma | FLUX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free Free A few images a day. | Starter Free One person learning or sketching a first product. | Open weights Free Developers and hobbyists with a decent graphics card. |
Go See website Light users who hit the free limits. | ProfessionalOur pick $16/mo per full seat Small teams designing a real product. | Playground and APIOur pick From $0.041 per image Anyone who wants the best FLUX models without a subscription. | |
PlusOur pick See website Most marketers and business owners. | Organization $55/mo per full seat, billed yearly Companies with several teams. | Self-hosting licence Custom Companies running FLUX on their own servers. | |
Pro See website Heavy daily users. | Enterprise $90/mo per full seat, billed yearly Large organisations with security and governance needs. | ||
Business See website Teams who need shared workspaces and admin. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Free is enough to find out if the quality suits you. Plus is the one to buy if you make images most days, because the limits stop getting in the way and you get the whole assistant too. Pro is only for people living in ChatGPT all day. | Start on Starter if it is just you. Move to Professional when you have a developer or second designer involved, and put them on a cheaper dev or collab seat rather than a full seat. Organization and Enterprise are for companies, not small businesses. | Top up $10 to $20 of Playground credits and you will get a couple of hundred standard images. If you already pay for Krea, Magnific or Leonardo, try FLUX there first. Only look at open weights or a self-hosting licence if you have a developer and a reason to run it yourself. |
Key features
| Attribute | ChatGPT Images | Figma | FLUX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | ChatGPT Images | Figma | FLUX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | ChatGPT Images | Figma | FLUX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, ChatGPT Images, Figma or FLUX?
ChatGPT Images scores highest overall in our ratings (ChatGPT Images 4.2/5, Figma 4.1/5 and FLUX 4.0/5). ChatGPT Images is best for mockups and signage with real text and editing an image by describing changes. Figma is best for website and app design and clickable prototypes. FLUX is best for precise layouts with elements placed where you want and editing one part of a photo and keeping the rest.
Which is cheaper, ChatGPT Images, Figma or FLUX?
ChatGPT Images: It's free to use. Figma: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $16/mo per full seat. FLUX: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at From $0.041 per image.
Which is easier to use, ChatGPT Images, Figma or FLUX?
ChatGPT Images rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who already uses ChatGPT and wants quick, accurate images without learning another tool.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Image, Logo & Design in the library.
