Side-by-side comparison · AI Assistants & LLMs
Artificial Analysis vs Langdock vs Qwen Chat
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone choosing an AI model or tool who wants independent numbers on quality, speed and price before paying.
Pick it if: European mid-size companies that want to roll out AI to every employee with multiple models and strict data controls.
Pick it if: Anyone after a capable free assistant with image, video, slides and website tools, and developers who want open models.
Overview
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | Langdock | Qwen Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Free, independent scores for how smart, fast and cheap each AI model is. | A company-wide ChatGPT-style workspace with many AI models, agents and EU hosting. | Alibaba's generous free assistant for research, slides, websites, images and video. |
| Pricing model | Free | Paid | Freemium |
| Starting price | Free | €25/user/mo | $4/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | No |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | Langdock | Qwen Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3Winner | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | Langdock | Qwen Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | No | Yes |
| Mobile app | No | – | Yes |
| Desktop app | No | – | No |
| Browser extension | No | – | No |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | No | Yes | No |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | No | Yes | No |
| Connects to other apps | No | Yes | No |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | Yes | Yes |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | No | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | Yes | Yes |
| Makes images | No | Yes | Yes |
| Makes video | No | No | Yes |
| Writes code | No | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | No | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | – | No |
| Works in many languages | – | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 2/ 17 | 11/ 17 | 11/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | Langdock | Qwen Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | FreeOur pick Free Everyone choosing between AI models. | Trial Free for 7 days Testing with a few colleagues. | FreeOur pick Free Most people. The free limits are generous for chat and research. |
Commercial Custom Companies that need deeper data or custom testing. | Business (Standard seat)Our pick €25/user/mo Most staff in a company rollout. | Go $4/mo Regular users who want higher chat limits. | |
Business (Max seat) €99/user/mo Heavy users who hit limits. | Plus $19/mo Creators making images and video most days. | ||
Enterprise Custom Companies over 1,000 users. | Pro $99/mo Heavy video and image users who need priority. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Use the free site. The paid data and custom testing are for AI companies and large businesses comparing models at scale. | Give most staff Standard seats and buy Max seats only for the few who use AI all day. Yearly billing saves about 20%, and seat prices drop with volume. | Start free; most people never need to pay. Go at $4 is cheap if you hit the chat limits. Prices are App Store prices, so check the in-app screen before you subscribe. |
Key features
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | Langdock | Qwen Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | Langdock | Qwen Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | Langdock | Qwen Chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Artificial Analysis, Langdock or Qwen Chat?
Artificial Analysis scores highest overall in our ratings (Artificial Analysis 4.3/5, Langdock 4.2/5 and Qwen Chat 4.0/5). Artificial Analysis is best for checking which AI model is best right now and Comparing API prices and speeds. Langdock is best for rolling out AI to a whole company in the EU and using several AI models under one login. Qwen Chat is best for A free assistant that does a bit of everything and quick webpages and slide decks from a prompt.
Which is cheaper, Artificial Analysis, Langdock or Qwen Chat?
Artificial Analysis: It's free to use. Langdock: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at €25/user/mo. Qwen Chat: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $4/mo.
Which is easier to use, Artificial Analysis, Langdock or Qwen Chat?
Langdock rates highest for ease of use in our scores. European mid-size companies that want to roll out AI to every employee with multiple models and strict data controls.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.
