Side-by-side comparison · AI Assistants & LLMs
Artificial Analysis vs ChatGPT vs Langdock
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Anyone choosing an AI model or tool who wants independent numbers on quality, speed and price before paying.
Pick it if: Anyone who wants one general-purpose assistant that handles most everyday jobs.
Pick it if: European mid-size companies that want to roll out AI to every employee with multiple models and strict data controls.
Overview
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | ChatGPT | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Free, independent scores for how smart, fast and cheap each AI model is. | OpenAI's all-rounder: chat, images, voice, web search and agents in one app. | A company-wide ChatGPT-style workspace with many AI models, agents and EU hosting. |
| Pricing model | Free | Freemium | Paid |
| Starting price | Free | $8/mo | €25/user/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | No | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | ChatGPT | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 3.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | ChatGPT | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | No |
| Mobile app | No | Yes | – |
| Desktop app | No | Yes | – |
| Browser extension | No | Yes | – |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | No | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | No | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | No | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | No | No | Yes |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | No | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | – | Yes | Yes |
| Makes images | No | Yes | Yes |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | Yes | Yes |
| Runs agents or automations | No | Yes | Yes |
| Learns your brand or style | – | Yes | – |
| Works in many languages | – | Yes | Yes |
| Capabilities score | 2/ 17 | 15/ 17 | 11/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | ChatGPT | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | FreeOur pick Free Everyone choosing between AI models. | Free Free Trying it out and everyday questions. | Trial Free for 7 days Testing with a few colleagues. |
Commercial Custom Companies that need deeper data or custom testing. | Go $8/mo Casual users who hit the free limits. | Business (Standard seat)Our pick €25/user/mo Most staff in a company rollout. | |
PlusOur pick $20/mo Anyone using it most days for work. | Business (Max seat) €99/user/mo Heavy users who hit limits. | ||
Pro From $100/mo Heavy users and people living in Codex. | Enterprise Custom Companies over 1,000 users. | ||
Business See website Teams from 2 people up. | |||
| Which plan to pick | Use the free site. The paid data and custom testing are for AI companies and large businesses comparing models at scale. | The free plan is now good enough to use properly, so stay on it until the image, voice or research limits annoy you. Plus is the sensible upgrade. Only look at Pro if you run Codex or deep research all day, and read the current tier details first: Pro 200 now comes with a smaller allowance than it did before 29 September. | Give most staff Standard seats and buy Max seats only for the few who use AI all day. Yearly billing saves about 20%, and seat prices drop with volume. |
Key features
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | ChatGPT | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | ChatGPT | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Artificial Analysis | ChatGPT | Langdock |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Artificial Analysis, ChatGPT or Langdock?
They tie on our overall rating (Artificial Analysis 4.3/5, ChatGPT 4.3/5 and Langdock 4.2/5). Artificial Analysis is best for checking which AI model is best right now and Comparing API prices and speeds. ChatGPT is best for everyday questions and brainstorming and making and editing images in the chat. Langdock is best for rolling out AI to a whole company in the EU and using several AI models under one login.
Which is cheaper, Artificial Analysis, ChatGPT or Langdock?
Artificial Analysis: It's free to use. ChatGPT: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $8/mo. Langdock: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at €25/user/mo.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.
