Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Sales & Customer Support

Apollo.io vs Clay vs Intercom

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Apollo.io

4.0

From $49/seat/mo

Clay

3.7

From From $167/mo

Best overall

Intercom

4.2

From $0.99 per outcome

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Founders, small sales teams and marketers who need to find B2B contacts and email them.

Clay3.7

Pick it if: Growth marketers, sales ops people and agencies who build targeted lead lists and personalised outbound.

Best overall

Pick it if: Online businesses and software companies with a support team that wants an AI agent to take the first pass at every question.

Intercom scores highest overall, but Apollo.io gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeApollo.ioClayIntercom
In one lineB2B contact database with emails and phone numbers, plus sequences to reach them.Builds and enriches lead lists from 100+ data sources, with an AI agent for web research.Customer support inbox, help centre and chat, with the Fin AI agent answering first.
Pricing modelFreemiumFreemiumPaid
Starting price$49/seat/moFrom $167/mo$0.99 per outcome
Free plan Yes Yes No
Works with Claude Code Yes No Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeApollo.ioClayIntercom
Overall rating4.03.74.2Winner
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
4.5
2.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.5
5.0
5.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
3.0
4.5
4.5
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.0
3.0
3.0
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5
4.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeApollo.ioClayIntercom
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes No
Mobile app Yes– Yes
Desktop app–––
Browser extension Yes Yes–
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO Yes Yes Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No No
AI abilities
Works with your files– Yes Yes
Understands images–– Yes
Makes images No No No
Makes video No No No
Writes code–– No
Runs agents or automations Yes Yes Yes
Learns your brand or style–– Yes
Works in many languages–– Yes
Capabilities score8/ 178/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeApollo.ioClayIntercom
Plans

Free

Free

Founders testing outbound.

Free

Free

Learning Clay and small tests.

Fin on its own

$0.99 per outcome, monthly minimum

Teams happy with their current helpdesk who want the AI agent only.

Basic

$49/seat/mo billed yearly

Individual sellers doing regular outbound.

LaunchOur pick

From $167/mo, less billed yearly

Founders and small teams building outbound lists.

Essential

$29/seat/mo, plus $0.99 per Fin outcome

Small teams starting out with live chat and an AI agent.

ProfessionalOur pick

$79/seat/mo billed yearly

Full-time reps.

Growth

From $446/mo, less billed yearly

Teams syncing Clay with their CRM.

AdvancedOur pick

$85/seat/mo, plus $0.99 per Fin outcome

Growing support teams that need automation and several inboxes.

Organization

$119/seat/mo billed yearly (min 3 seats)

Sales teams wanting advanced controls.

Enterprise

Custom

Large teams needing SSO and controls.

Expert

$132/seat/mo, plus $0.99 per Fin outcome

Larger teams with security and multi-brand needs.

Which plan to pickStart on Free to check the data covers your market. Basic suits one person prospecting; Professional is worth it if you also call prospects or want AI scoring. Monthly billing costs noticeably more than the yearly prices shown.Learn on Free, then move to Launch when you are ready to run real campaigns. Only take Growth if you need CRM sync or the API. Set credit budgets on every table.Start the 14-day trial and see how many conversations Fin handles, because that number drives the bill more than seats do. Most teams with more than a couple of agents end up on Advanced for the workflows. If you already run Zendesk or Salesforce and like it, try Fin on its own first.

Key features

AttributeApollo.ioClayIntercom
Standout features
  • Contact database
  • Email sequences
  • Chrome extension
  • Dialer and call recording
  • AI research and scoring
  • Enrichment
  • Waterfall enrichment
  • Claygent
  • Signals
  • AI writing
  • CRM sync
  • Sequencer
  • Fin AI agent
  • Shared inbox and tickets
  • Messenger chat widget
  • Help centre
  • Workflows
  • Copilot for agents

Pros and cons

AttributeApollo.ioClayIntercom
Pros
  • Generous free plan for getting started
  • Database and outreach in one tool
  • Much cheaper than ZoomInfo
  • Easy to learn for non-technical users
  • Finds more emails and numbers than any one database
  • Claygent can research almost anything about a company
  • Very flexible: build exactly the list you need
  • Useful free plan for learning
  • Fin gives some of the most accurate answers of any AI support agent
  • Inbox, chat, help centre and AI all built to work together
  • Fin can run on top of another helpdesk, so you can trial it without moving
  • Clean, modern inbox that support staff pick up quickly
  • Public API and an official MCP server
Cons
  • Bounce rates and out-of-date contacts are common complaints
  • Weaker phone and contact data outside the US
  • Credits run out fast and do not roll over
  • Billing disputes and slow support on lower plans
  • Steep learning curve for non-technical users
  • Credits and actions are easy to burn, with no sandbox for testing
  • Two-currency pricing makes the bill hard to predict
  • Frequent pricing changes in 2026 confused existing customers
  • Per-seat plus per-conversation pricing makes the monthly bill hard to predict
  • You pay for a Fin outcome even when a customer leaves after a weak answer, by some users' accounts
  • Many useful features sit on higher plans or paid add-ons
  • Slow or patchy responses from Intercom's own support in user reviews
  • Ownership change (renamed Fin, being bought by Salesforce) adds uncertainty

Who each one is for

AttributeApollo.ioClayIntercom
Best for
  • Finding business emails and phone numbers
  • Building B2B lead lists
  • Simple cold email sequences
  • Cheaper alternative to ZoomInfo
  • Building niche lead lists
  • Finding emails and phone numbers from many sources
  • AI research on each prospect
  • Keeping CRM data enriched
  • Answering common customer questions automatically
  • Website and in-app live chat
  • A shared support inbox with ticketing
  • Building a help centre the AI learns from
  • Support across chat, email and phone in one place
You'll find it used by
  • Founders
  • Sales development reps
  • Account executives
  • Marketers
  • Recruiters
  • Growth marketers
  • Sales ops
  • Outbound agencies
  • Founders
  • Recruiters
  • Support teams
  • Software companies
  • Online stores
  • Customer success teams

Questions people ask

Which is better, Apollo.io, Clay or Intercom?

Intercom scores highest overall in our ratings (Apollo.io 4.0/5, Clay 3.7/5 and Intercom 4.2/5). Apollo.io is best for finding business emails and phone numbers and Building B2B lead lists. Clay is best for building niche lead lists and finding emails and phone numbers from many sources. Intercom is best for answering common customer questions automatically and website and in-app live chat.

Which is cheaper, Apollo.io, Clay or Intercom?

Apollo.io: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $49/seat/mo. Clay: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at From $167/mo. Intercom: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $0.99 per outcome.

Which is easier to use, Apollo.io, Clay or Intercom?

Apollo.io rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Founders, small sales teams and marketers who need to find B2B contacts and email them.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Sales & Customer Support in the library.