Side-by-side comparison · Writing & Translation
Copyleaks vs GPTZero vs Originality.ai
Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.
Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.
At a glance
Pick it if: Schools, publishers and businesses that need AI and plagiarism checks together, especially across several languages.
Pick it if: Teachers, editors and business owners who want a second opinion on whether writing they've been handed came from AI.
Pick it if: Publishers, content agencies, SEO teams and businesses that commission written content and want to check it before publishing.
Overview
| Attribute | Copyleaks | GPTZero | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| In one line | Checks text for AI writing and plagiarism in one scan, in over 30 languages. | Checks whether text was written by AI, with plagiarism and citation checks too. | Checks content for AI writing, plagiarism and factual errors before you publish it. |
| Pricing model | Freemium | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting price | $0 | $0 | $14.95/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Works with Claude Code | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Rating breakdown
Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.
| Attribute | Copyleaks | GPTZero | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.9 | 4.2Winner | 4.1 |
| Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together. | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them. | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan. | 3.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over. | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Feature comparison
A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.
| Attribute | Copyleaks | GPTZero | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Access & platform | |||
| Free plan | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Mobile app | No | No | – |
| Desktop app | – | – | – |
| Browser extension | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Teams & business | |||
| Team workspace | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise plan or SSO | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Connects to other apps | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Open source or self-hosted | Yes | No | No |
| AI abilities | |||
| Works with your files | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Understands images | Yes | – | – |
| Makes images | No | No | No |
| Makes video | No | No | No |
| Writes code | No | No | No |
| Runs agents or automations | No | No | No |
| Learns your brand or style | – | – | – |
| Works in many languages | Yes | Yes | – |
| Capabilities score | 10/ 17 | 8/ 17 | 7/ 17 |
Pricing
Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.
| Attribute | Copyleaks | GPTZero | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Plans | Free $0 Quick one-off checks. | Free $0 Checking the odd document. | Free Free Checking the odd article. |
PersonalOur pick $16.99/mo, or $13.99/mo billed yearly Individuals checking work regularly. | PremiumOur pick $23.99/mo, or $12.99/mo billed yearly Teachers and editors checking work every week. | ProOur pick $14.95/mo, or $12.95/mo billed yearly Agencies and site owners checking content every week. | |
Pro $99.99/mo, or $74.99/mo billed yearly Teams and agencies. | Professional $45.99/mo, or $24.99/mo billed yearly Agencies and heavy users scanning lots of files. | Enterprise $179/mo, or $136.58/mo billed yearly Publishers and large content teams. | |
Enterprise and Education Custom Companies and schools at scale. | Team Professional price per seat, 2 seats minimum Schools and businesses buying for a group. | ||
| Which plan to pick | Try the free checker first. Personal covers about 100 pages a month, which suits most individuals. Only move to Pro if a team needs seats or you want website scans. One credit covers 250 words or one image. | Start on Free. If you check more than a few documents a week, Premium on yearly billing is the sweet spot. Professional only makes sense if you scan big batches of files. | Pro is enough for most agencies and site owners. An AI and plagiarism check together uses two credits per 100 words, so budget about 100,000 words of checked content a month. Go Enterprise only if you need the API or very high volume. |
Key features
| Attribute | Copyleaks | GPTZero | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standout features |
|
|
|
Pros and cons
| Attribute | Copyleaks | GPTZero | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
Who each one is for
| Attribute | Copyleaks | GPTZero | Originality.ai |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for |
|
|
|
| You'll find it used by |
|
|
|
Questions people ask
Which is better, Copyleaks, GPTZero or Originality.ai?
GPTZero scores highest overall in our ratings (Copyleaks 3.9/5, GPTZero 4.2/5 and Originality.ai 4.1/5). Copyleaks is best for AI and plagiarism checks in one report and checking content in languages other than English. GPTZero is best for checking essays and assignments for AI writing and screening freelance or agency content. Originality.ai is best for checking freelance and agency content and AI and plagiarism checks in one scan.
Which is cheaper, Copyleaks, GPTZero or Originality.ai?
Copyleaks: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0. GPTZero: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $0. Originality.ai: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $14.95/mo.
Which is easier to use, Copyleaks, GPTZero or Originality.ai?
GPTZero rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Teachers, editors and business owners who want a second opinion on whether writing they've been handed came from AI.
How we compare
Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.
Swap in another tool
More tools from Writing & Translation in the library.
