Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison · Marketing & Ads

Buffer vs Hootsuite

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Best overall

Buffer

4.2

From $6/channel/mo

Hootsuite

3.6

From $99/user/mo

Comparing 2 tools. Add one more if you like.

At a glance

Best overallBest valueEasiest to use

Pick it if: Small businesses, solo founders and creators who want to post regularly across several social networks without paying for an enterprise suite.

Pick it if: Marketing teams, agencies and larger businesses managing many social accounts with several people involved.

Overview

AttributeBufferHootsuite
In one lineSchedules posts to every social network from one queue, with an AI writing helper.Runs social media for a team: scheduling, shared inbox, listening and reports.
Pricing modelFreemiumPaid
Starting price$6/channel/mo$99/user/mo
Free plan Yes No
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeBufferHootsuite
Overall rating4.2Winner3.6
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
5.0
3.5
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
3.5
4.5
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
4.5
2.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.0
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeBufferHootsuite
Access & platform
Free plan Yes No
Mobile app Yes Yes
Desktop app No–
Browser extension Yes Yes
API access Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace Yes Yes
Enterprise plan or SSO– Yes
Connects to other apps Yes Yes
Open source or self-hosted No No
AI abilities
Works with your files Yes Yes
Understands images––
Makes images No Yes
Makes video No No
Writes code No No
Runs agents or automations No–
Learns your brand or style– Yes
Works in many languages Yes Yes
Capabilities score8/ 1710/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeBufferHootsuite
Plans

Free

Free

A sole trader posting a few times a week.

StandardOur pick

$99/user/mo billed yearly

A single social media manager.

EssentialsOur pick

$6/channel/mo, or $5/channel/mo billed yearly

One person running a business's social accounts.

Professional

$199/user/mo billed yearly

Growing teams with lots of accounts.

Team

$12/channel/mo, or $10/channel/mo billed yearly

Small teams who need approvals.

Advanced

$399/user/mo billed yearly

Larger teams that need routing and approvals.

Enterprise

Custom

Big organisations with compliance needs.

Which plan to pickStart on Free to see if you will actually post regularly. Move to Essentials once you need more than 10 posts queued per channel; Team is only worth it when someone else needs to approve posts.Standard covers one person running up to 10 accounts. Only step up when you need unlimited accounts or team routing, and negotiate at renewal, because users often report bigger quotes the second year.

Key features

AttributeBufferHootsuite
Standout features
  • Publishing queue
  • AI Assistant
  • Ideas board
  • Comments inbox
  • Analytics
  • Start Page
  • Planner and scheduling
  • Shared inbox
  • Social listening
  • OwlyWriter and OwlyGPT
  • Analytics and reports
  • Approvals and roles

Pros and cons

AttributeBufferHootsuite
Pros
  • Very easy to learn, with a clean interface
  • Real free plan, and low per-channel prices
  • Covers almost every network, including Threads, Bluesky and Google Business Profile
  • AI Assistant is included on every plan
  • Public API and official MCP server
  • Covers scheduling, inbox, listening and reporting in one product
  • Strong analytics and client-ready reports
  • Solid approval and team workflows
  • Supports a very wide range of networks and integrations
Cons
  • Analytics are basic next to Hootsuite or Sprout Social
  • Per-channel pricing climbs quickly once you manage many accounts
  • Some users report posts occasionally failing to publish or duplicating
  • No social listening, and the inbox is lighter than a full social suite
  • Expensive per user, and there is no free plan
  • Many complaints about renewal price rises, auto-renew charges and slow support on billing
  • Interface feels busy and takes time to learn
  • Month-to-month prices are not published up front

Who each one is for

AttributeBufferHootsuite
Best for
  • Scheduling posts across many networks
  • Small teams on a tight budget
  • Turning one post into versions for each network
  • Keeping a regular posting rhythm
  • Teams managing many accounts
  • Shared inbox for comments and DMs
  • Monitoring brand and competitor mentions
  • Client and management reporting
  • Approval workflows
You'll find it used by
  • Small business owners
  • Solo founders
  • Creators
  • Small marketing teams
  • Non-profits
  • Marketing teams
  • Social media managers
  • Agencies
  • Enterprises
  • Government and higher education

Questions people ask

Which is better, Buffer or Hootsuite?

Buffer scores highest overall in our ratings (Buffer 4.2/5 and Hootsuite 3.6/5). Buffer is best for scheduling posts across many networks and small teams on a tight budget. Hootsuite is best for teams managing many accounts and shared inbox for comments and DMs.

Which is cheaper, Buffer or Hootsuite?

Buffer: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $6/channel/mo. Hootsuite: There's no free plan. Paid plans start at $99/user/mo.

Which is easier to use, Buffer or Hootsuite?

Buffer rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Small businesses, solo founders and creators who want to post regularly across several social networks without paying for an enterprise suite.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from Marketing & Ads in the library.