Skip to content

Side-by-side comparison ยท AI Assistants & LLMs

Artificial Analysis vs Claude vs Qwen Chat

Everything that matters when choosing between them, in one place: our rating, what each can do, what they cost, and the trade-offs.

Artificial Analysis

4.3

Free to start

Best overall

Claude

4.6

From $20/mo

Qwen Chat

4.0

From $4/mo

Comparing 3 tools, the maximum.

At a glance

Best value

Pick it if: Anyone choosing an AI model or tool who wants independent numbers on quality, speed and price before paying.

Best overallEasiest to use

Pick it if: Anyone who writes, researches or makes decisions for a living, plus anyone curious about Claude Code.

Pick it if: Anyone after a capable free assistant with image, video, slides and website tools, and developers who want open models.

Claude scores highest overall, but Artificial Analysis gives you more for your money. Which one is right comes down to what you value most.

Overview

AttributeArtificial AnalysisClaudeQwen Chat
In one lineFree, independent scores for how smart, fast and cheap each AI model is.Anthropic's chat assistant, at its best on careful writing and long documents.Alibaba's generous free assistant for research, slides, websites, images and video.
Pricing modelFreeFreemiumFreemium
Starting priceFree$20/mo$4/mo
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Works with Claude Code Yes Yes No

Rating breakdown

Our scores out of 5. The higher bar in each row is highlighted.

AttributeArtificial AnalysisClaudeQwen Chat
Overall rating4.34.6Winner4.0
Ease of useHow quickly someone non-technical gets value from it.
3.5
4.5
4.0
FeaturesHow completely it covers its own job, and how well the pieces fit together.
4.0
4.5
4.0
Output qualityHow good the results are before you fix them.
4.5
5.0
4.0
Value for moneyWhat you get for the price, including the free plan.
5.0
4.5
4.5
Speed & reliabilityHow fast it is and how often it falls over.
4.5
4.5
3.5

Feature comparison

A tick means it does this today. A dash means we haven't checked.

AttributeArtificial AnalysisClaudeQwen Chat
Access & platform
Free plan Yes Yes Yes
Mobile app No Yes Yes
Desktop app No Yes No
Browser extension No Yes No
API access Yes Yes Yes
Teams & business
Team workspace No Yes No
Enterprise plan or SSO No Yes No
Connects to other apps No Yes No
Open source or self-hosted No No Yes
AI abilities
Works with your files No Yes Yes
Understands imagesโ€“ Yes Yes
Makes images No No Yes
Makes video No No Yes
Writes code No Yes Yes
Runs agents or automations No Yes Yes
Learns your brand or styleโ€“ Yes No
Works in many languagesโ€“ Yes Yes
Capabilities score2/ 1714/ 1711/ 17

Pricing

Plans as listed on each vendor's site when we last checked. Confirm before you buy.

AttributeArtificial AnalysisClaudeQwen Chat
Plans

FreeOur pick

Free

Everyone choosing between AI models.

Free

Free

Trying it out and light daily use.

FreeOur pick

Free

Most people. The free limits are generous for chat and research.

Commercial

Custom

Companies that need deeper data or custom testing.

ProOur pick

$20/mo, or $17/mo billed yearly

Anyone who uses it most days.

Go

$4/mo

Regular users who want higher chat limits.

Max

From $100/mo

Heavy users and people living in Claude Code.

Plus

$19/mo

Creators making images and video most days.

Team

From $20/seat/mo billed yearly

Businesses with 2 to 150 people.

Pro

$99/mo

Heavy video and image users who need priority.

Which plan to pickUse the free site. The paid data and custom testing are for AI companies and large businesses comparing models at scale.Start on Free to see if the writing suits you. Most people who stick with it move to Pro within a month; only go to Max if you hit the Pro limits every day or you're running Claude Code for hours at a time.Start free; most people never need to pay. Go at $4 is cheap if you hit the chat limits. Prices are App Store prices, so check the in-app screen before you subscribe.

Key features

AttributeArtificial AnalysisClaudeQwen Chat
Standout features
  • Intelligence Index
  • Speed and cost
  • Media arenas
  • Coding agent index
  • Model Recommender
  • Free API
  • Projects
  • Artifacts
  • Long documents
  • Web search and connectors
  • Tasks and Claude Code
  • Memory
  • Deep Research
  • Web Dev
  • Slides
  • Image and video
  • Thinking mode
  • Open models

Pros and cons

AttributeArtificial AnalysisClaudeQwen Chat
Pros
  • Free and independent
  • Covers text, image, video, speech and coding agents
  • Shows speed and price, not just quality
  • Updated quickly when new models launch
  • Free API for the data
  • Writing sounds like a person and needs the least editing of any assistant
  • Handles long documents and messy briefs without losing track
  • Projects and memory mean you stop repeating the same context
  • Artifacts turn answers into real documents, slides and small apps
  • One subscription covers Claude Code as well
  • The free plan now includes memory, connectors and Artifacts
  • One of the most generous free plans in the category
  • Broad toolkit: research, slides, websites, images and video in one place
  • Top Qwen models rank near the best US models
  • Open models you can run yourself
  • International service is run from Singapore
Cons
  • A reference site you check, with nothing to do your work in
  • Test scores don't always match how a model handles your tasks
  • Dense charts take some getting used to
  • Free and Pro usage limits can bite on a busy day
  • No image or video generation, which ChatGPT and Gemini both have
  • The free plan doesn't include the top Opus models
  • Fewer third-party connectors and plugins than ChatGPT
  • Avoids or slants topics sensitive to the Chinese government
  • Thinking mode on the newest models can be very slow
  • Paid plans are new and the free limits aren't published, so it's unclear how long the free plan stays this generous
  • Chats can be used, de-identified, to improve the service; you have to email to opt out of training
  • No connections to business apps

Who each one is for

AttributeArtificial AnalysisClaudeQwen Chat
Best for
  • Checking which AI model is best right now
  • Comparing API prices and speeds
  • Picking an image, video or voice model
  • Seeing how a new model stacks up on launch day
  • Long-form writing and editing
  • Reading and summarising long documents
  • Thinking through a plan or decision
  • Pairing with Claude Code
  • A free assistant that does a bit of everything
  • Quick webpages and slide decks from a prompt
  • Free image and short video generation
  • Deep research reports
  • Developers who want open models
You'll find it used by
  • Developers
  • Founders
  • Journalists
  • AI enthusiasts
  • Investors
  • Writers and marketers
  • Founders
  • Consultants
  • Developers
  • Students
  • Developers
  • Budget-conscious founders
  • Content creators

Questions people ask

Which is better, Artificial Analysis, Claude or Qwen Chat?

Claude scores highest overall in our ratings (Artificial Analysis 4.3/5, Claude 4.6/5 and Qwen Chat 4.0/5). Artificial Analysis is best for checking which AI model is best right now and Comparing API prices and speeds. Claude is best for long-form writing and editing and reading and summarising long documents. Qwen Chat is best for A free assistant that does a bit of everything and quick webpages and slide decks from a prompt.

Which is cheaper, Artificial Analysis, Claude or Qwen Chat?

Artificial Analysis: It's free to use. Claude: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $20/mo. Qwen Chat: There's a free plan, and paid plans start at $4/mo.

Which is easier to use, Artificial Analysis, Claude or Qwen Chat?

Claude rates highest for ease of use in our scores. Anyone who writes, researches or makes decisions for a living, plus anyone curious about Claude Code.

How we compare

Ratings are our own, from using each tool, across ease of use, features, output quality, value for money, speed & reliability.

Swap in another tool

More tools from AI Assistants & LLMs in the library.